Talk:David Gareji monastery complex

	Georgia (country) portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Georgia (country), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Georgia and Georgians on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Georgia (country)Wikipedia:WikiProject Georgia (country)Template:WikiProject Georgia (country)Georgia (country) articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Azerbaijan Mid‑importance

	Azerbaijan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Azerbaijan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Azerbaijan-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AzerbaijanWikipedia:WikiProject AzerbaijanTemplate:WikiProject AzerbaijanAzerbaijan articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Architecture Mid‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.

Christianity: Eastern O. Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Eastern Orthodoxy (assessed as Mid-importance).

Middle Ages Low‑importance

	Middle Ages portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

It was full of redlinks when I got here, it's shoddy and has a poverty of words. As I don't know anything about the topic, I decided to tag the page and leave it for someone more knowledgable. - Bladeswin 00:15, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Part of that ugliness was the presence of the image tags, which I've removed for now. They can be reinstated later if necessary. There are few paragraphing issues at this stage. Bobo . 19:51, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on David Gareja monastery complex. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 13:10, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on David Gareja monastery complex. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070708090756/http://www.geotimes.ge/index.php?m=home&newsid=3887 to http://www.geotimes.ge/index.php?m=home&newsid=3887

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:54, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Map of Georgia

Article says that David Gareja monastery complex is "Georgian Orthodox monastery complex located in the Kakheti region of Eastern Georgia" and only "Part of the complex is located in the Agstafa rayon of Azerbaijan". I think it is misleading to show Azerbaijan map (red dot on it) and not Georgian. P.S. Most other language articles show Georgian map.D.Goletiani (talk) 08:32, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Name

This is a 6th century Georgian monastery, whatever angle i look at it, i don't see how relevant it is to add an Azerbaijani name for it. Azerbaijani ethnos was completed by the end of the 16th century, some 1000 years after the foundation of this complex and has nothing to do with it. Azerbaijani claims on parts of their neighbours' territories doesn't matter.---Wikaviani ^{(talk) (contribs)} 22:09, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Aykhan Zayedzadeh: Here we go, i had already opened a section for this discussion, your "biased POV" title shows only one thing, your lack of neutrality in this matter. Again, this monastery has been founded by Georgians in the 6th century, so 1000 years before "Azerbaijanis people" emerged, and is of great significance for the Georgian people while it's only considered as a strategic position by the Azerbaijani gov, don't see how your addition was legit.---Wikaviani ^{(talk) (contribs)} 22:25, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Wikaviani:, "it's only considered as a strategic position by the Azerbaijani gov", your lack of neutrality is also visible :))), I'm not saying that Azerbaijani Turks founded the church, it is factually impossible. As a closest successor to the Caucasian Albania, the official language of Azerbaijan must be used as the alternative. Another thing, if the subject of the article has multiple names, all must be indicated in the lead, if there are too much, then a separate section shall be created, like in here. --► Sincerely: A¥×aᚢ ⚔ Zaÿïþzaþ€ 22:47, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Aykhan Zayedzadeh: Seriously ??? you're kidding me right ? We already had this discussion once, how is the Azerbaijan Republic, a state created in 1918, a "closest successor to the Caucasian Albania" ??? Caucasian Albania's history goes from 6th century BC to 8th century AC ! how can you claim such nonsense ? Once again, You behave like a POV pusher, blinded by your pro-Azerbaijani nationalism, unfortunately ...---Wikaviani ^{(talk) (contribs)} 21:20, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Wikaviani:, I like how Persian nationalists call me a Azerbaijani nationalist or Pan-Turkist, while Azerbaijani nationalists call me a traitor/Armenian etc. When I mention "Azerbaijani", I don't imply Turkic. Talysh, Avars, Khinalug people are also Azerbaijani. I'm talking about Azerbaijan as a historical region, not a Republic formed in 1918. I do acknowledge the Turkification process of the 12th century. Btw, Turkic Azerbaijan's oldest nation is not ADR, it is Ak/Qara Koyunlu at the least. I can same the same thing about POV-pushing about you. For example, look at this article. Built by Tibetans, but in a disputed territory within the control of India, but lead mentions its Urdu name. --► Sincerely: A¥×aᚢ ⚔ Zaÿïþzaþ€ 21:29, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"I'm talking about Azerbaijan as a historical region, not a Republic formed in 1918" There was no "Azerbaijan" north of Aras before 1918, again, you refuse to get the point.
"Turkic Azerbaijan's oldest nation is not ADR, it is Ak/Qara Koyunlu at the least" Even these 14th century entities are far from being a "closest successor" of Caucasian Albania ...
"I can same the same thing about POV-pushing about you." Please be my guest, go ahead and provide evidences for your claim, otherwise, this is nothing else than a personal attack of yours, i.e. your usual behaviour when you come short of arguments.---Wikaviani ^{(talk) (contribs)} 21:44, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Biased POV

This revert is totally baseless, @Wikaviani:. It is a disputed territory, MUST be named both in Azerbaijani and Georgian, per neutral point-of-view. Contrary, is just a proof is biased editing. Also, Azerbaijani sources claim that it is Albanian church. --► Sincerely: A¥×aᚢ ⚔ Zaÿïþzaþ€ 22:11, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]