Talk:David Attenborough: A Life on Our Planet
Appearance
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from David Attenborough: A Life on Our Planet appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 3 November 2020 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
Did you know nomination
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 12:59, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
( )
- ... that the film A Life On Our Planet (2020) is David Attenborough's self-described "witness statement" for how human activity has affected the environment? Source: NYT
Created by Bilorv (talk). Self-nominated at 19:15, 7 October 2020 (UTC).
- Newness requirement met with > 5x expansion of narrative on 10/7. Also meets length requirement and is well-written with appropriate use of citations. Earwig detects no copyvio/plagiarism issues. Hook is short enough, interesting, and accurate per New York Times and Mashable articles. QPQ is satisfied. Cbl62 (talk) 20:07, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
- Hi, I came by to promote this, but the source says the book is the witness statement. Yoninah (talk) 11:38, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
- @Yoninah: what source are you reading? The source given above says
Calling the film (streaming on Netflix) his “witness statement” for the environment
. You can find the same phrase in other sources e.g. [1] or in the film itself. In any case, I do feel there's a distinction that was missing between the book and the film (both of which are based on the same material and both of which Attenborough describes as his "witness statement") so I've added "... that the film" to the start of the hook. — Bilorv (talk) 11:53, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
- @Bilorv: you marked it in the lead with footnote 3. Yoninah (talk) 12:15, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
- @Yoninah: I believe this issue is now fixed. — Bilorv (talk) 15:35, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you. Restoring tick per Cbl62's review. Yoninah (talk) 17:05, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
- @Yoninah: what source are you reading? The source given above says
A partial list of life forms
[edit]--2601:C4:C300:1BD0:708E:2510:279C:4124 (talk) 00:40, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
Cast
[edit]
--2601:C4:C300:1BD0:708E:2510:279C:4124 (talk) 00:39, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
- A list of animals in the film is reading as trivia. Please find citations indicating the significance of including each animal. Or, consider writing prose to include those animals. BOVINEBOY2008 00:41, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
Categories:
- C-Class BBC articles
- Low-importance BBC articles
- WikiProject BBC articles
- C-Class Climate change articles
- Mid-importance Climate change articles
- WikiProject Climate change articles
- C-Class Environment articles
- Low-importance Environment articles
- C-Class film articles
- C-Class British cinema articles
- British cinema task force articles
- C-Class Documentary films articles
- Documentary films task force articles
- WikiProject Film articles
- C-Class television articles
- Low-importance television articles
- WikiProject Television articles
- Wikipedia Did you know articles