Jump to content

Talk:Darryl Milburn

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by BorgQueen (talk01:33, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Moved to mainspace by BeanieFan11 (talk). Self-nominated at 21:53, 21 March 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Darryl Milburn; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems

Hook eligibility:

  • Cited: Yes
  • Interesting: Yes
  • Other problems: No - other problem

QPQ: No - Not done
Overall: @BeanieFan11: Good article. Though i think that hook alt1 should be worded differently like "that Darryl Milburn made his Canadian Football League debut on his birthday, but did not appear in any other games that year?" because putting the and there doesn't seem like the correct way to word it. Also need a QPQ. Onegreatjoke (talk) 18:51, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Approve. Onegreatjoke (talk) 16:46, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


GA Review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


This review is transcluded from Talk:Darryl Milburn/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Gonzo fan2007 (talk · contribs) 17:52, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


I'll review this one. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 17:52, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c (OR):
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

Overall:
Pass/Fail:

· · ·


Comments

[edit]
  • I copyedited the article here. Let me know if you disagree with any edits.
  • He was able to increase his size to 6 ft 5 in, 264 lb, the way this is written, it makes it seem like he made himself grow longer. Maybe rerword to say he increase his weight to 264 lbs while also growing 2 inches in height?
  • You can link Dispersal draft.
  • Ref spot checks: 3, 5, 7, 8, 13, 17, 19, 22, 24, 31

Looks good, putting on hold. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 18:37, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.