Jump to content

Talk:C418

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:Daniel Rosenfeld)

Requested move 11 March 2018

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: pages moved as requested per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 01:57, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


– Per WP:COMMONNAME. He is better recognised as C418 than by his real name, by sources and media. Lazz_R 01:03, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 14:53, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding recent reversion about "Rosenfeld possibly no longer contributing to Minecraft"

[edit]

My edit was reverted because it was "not from a reliable source" -- however, the secondary source I referenced includes direct quotes by Rosenfeld on his own Discord server, thus there was a primary source wrapped inside this secondary source. Rosenfeld's direct quotes include: "listen guys it hurts me as well" "I'm not happy about it but so long and thanks for all the fish" (These were brought up in a conversation about why Rosenfeld was not contributing any new compositions to the game). He also said "yeah, conflict of interest definitely" and "maybe if we stack the lawyers in a pyramid something will happen". @0xDeadbeef please advise as to why such direct quotes are not worthy of documentation on this page and Music of Minecraft. I can see how perhaps including the conjecture about the true nature of the legal issues as being not as reliable, if nothing because it is from a single source, but the non conjecture portion of the addition seems very much noteworthy and definitely reliable (primary source). LMK. Samuuurai (talk) 08:20, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

YouTube is not a generally reliable source, see WP:RSPYT. I personally believe that SalC1 is pretty reliable for their content about Minecraft, but a consensus for this should be reached at WP:RSN first. 0xDeadbeef 08:26, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]