Talk:Cyclone Vaianu

Cyclone Vaianu has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
March 26, 2010	Good article nominee	Listed

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on February 6, 2010.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that 2006's Cyclone Vaianu destroyed an estimated 70% of Tonga's banana crop, and caused power outages that took up to a week to fully restore?

Weather: Tropical Low‑importance

	Weather portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details. Articles Requested Project Resources Become a Member Project Talk Assessment A-Class Alerts WeatherWikipedia:WikiProject WeatherTemplate:WikiProject WeatherWeather articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Tropical cyclones portal This article is supported by WikiProject Tropical cyclones (assessed as Low-importance).

Fiji Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fiji, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fiji on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FijiWikipedia:WikiProject FijiTemplate:WikiProject FijiFiji articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Polynesia: Tonga Low‑importance

	Oceania portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Polynesia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Polynesia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolynesiaWikipedia:WikiProject PolynesiaTemplate:WikiProject PolynesiaPolynesia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Tonga (assessed as Low-importance).

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Cyclone Vaianu (2006)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Viennaiswaiting (talk) 17:52, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'll quickly review this so there aren't so many articles in the queue. hmm... few things right off the top. is that infobox right? there's that empty space, kinda looks bad. mh is a good length, but theres some problems.

you have "about 90 miles, (140 km), " - shouldn't you avoid those commas for the units?
where did the initial tropical depression come from? most mh articles have some sort o f precursor (like tropical wave or something)

JR, any word on this? –Juliancolton | ^Talk 20:00, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ive added a phrase to deal with this but specfic origins such as "it moved off the coast of africa as a Tropical Wave are rarely available as Nadi generally doesn't talk about them.Jason Rees (talk) 20:13, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

wat about the jtwc? do they ever have anything on origins? Viennaiswaiting (talk) 21:45, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Theres nothing from the JTWC.Jason Rees (talk) 22:01, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

little question: in 2nd sentence, shouldn't it read "tracked southeastward", not "eastward", per the track?
the last sentence of the first paragraph of the mh is really long: could you split it up for ease of reading?
you should mention in the beginning of the 2nd paragraph that Vavaʻu is an island in Tonga. i never heard of Vavaʻu, but i heard of tonga
you should link UTC and the Australian tropical cyclone scale
quick question: the article has mileage first with kilometers in parenthesis, but has wind speeds of km/h first with mph in parenthesis. is that right? seems inconsistent, but idk
- what about this? Viennaiswaiting (talk) 15:48, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  - I thought I fixed it. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 16:25, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    - Got one stray one. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 16:26, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
in the impact section, Fuaʻamotu should definitely be linked, and you should mention what country it's in (same w/ the beginning of the first paragraph of the impact, you should mention those stations are in tonga)
any deaths or damage total?

None that ive seen.Jason Rees (talk) 18:59, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

was the name retired or used again?

Niethers happened yetJason Rees (talk) 18:59, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

all in all, its pretty good. Viennaiswaiting (talk) 17:52, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Done with most of the rest. Thanks for the review! –Juliancolton | ^Talk 20:00, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ok, gd enough, ill pass. --Viennaiswaiting (talk) 15:47, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

wait, its not all taken care of. Viennaiswaiting (talk) 15:48, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cyclone Vaianu (2006). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/64F7esNTE?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.met.gov.fj%2Fdocuments%2FTC_Seasonal_Summary_05-061190690520.pdf to http://www.met.gov.fj/documents/TC_Seasonal_Summary_05-061190690520.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:36, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]