Jump to content

Talk:Cyclone Sina

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleCyclone Sina has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Featured topic starCyclone Sina is part of the 1990–91 South Pacific cyclone season series, a featured topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 1, 2014Good article nomineeListed
June 3, 2014Featured topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Good article

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Cyclone Sina/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Dana boomer (talk · contribs) 20:09, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I'll take this article for review, and should have my full comments up by later today. Dana boomer (talk) 20:09, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    • Lead, "Sina's remnants subsequently maintained its south-eastwards track, before they" Goes from plural to singular, then back to plural.
    • Lead, "were evacuated from Fiji's outer island resorts to hotels on the mainland, including resorts located within Fiji's northern and eastern divisions." - Sentence is unclear - were the resorts located in the north and east the ones evacuated or the ones being evacuated to? I'm similarly confused by the corresponding sentence in the body of the article.
    • MH, " as it intensified and the upper level steering flow which resulted in" - Ungrammatical
    • MH, second paragraph - numerous islands/island groups that could stand to be linked. Check the rest of the article for possible place links too.
    • Tonga, "alert for the Tongatapu, Haʻapai and Vavaʻu group of islands" and "the Tongatapu and Haʻapai group of islands" - Should these both be "groups of islands"?
    • Tonga, "after the roofs lost their iron." What does losing their iron mean?
    • Other island nations, "caused some damage to crops on Niue, the island's wharf," Why were there crops on the island's wharf?
    • Other island nations, second paragraph, "warning(s)" is used four times in two sentences...gets a little repetitive.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    There are a few prose niggles that need to be worked out, so I am placing the review on hold. Dana boomer (talk) 02:10, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
All sorted i think @Dana boomer:. Thanks for the review :).Jason Rees (talk) 00:54, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
OK, everything looks good, so I'm passing to GAN. Dana boomer (talk) 11:18, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Cyclone Sina. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:23, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]