Jump to content

Talk:Cyclone Nisha (2008)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Year in title

[edit]

I renamed this page since North Indian storms don't need the year in their titles. NI storm names are used sequentially and once only. Please see Lists of tropical cyclone names#North Indian Ocean -Ramisses (talk) 18:23, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There's an issue with this, the name is on the list of names for the South Pacific and will be used in the near future. That storm, if it gets an article, will also be called Cyclone Nisha and will create confusion with article titles. Cyclonebiskit 18:59, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Until there (probably next TC year) I personally prefer to keep this article as it is now since are not the same TC basin. -Ramisses (talk) 19:09, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
In that case, if the name Nisha is used in the South Pacific in 2009-2010(or 2010-2011 if the next season is as inactive as this one), will we move this page to Cyclone Nisha (2008)? 76.236.178.224 (talk) 20:34, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Yep Jason Rees (talk) 20:57, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Another thing we could do is move the page based on which of the 2 Nishas is more notable. This storm killed 204 and did 800 million in damages. If the South Pacific storm isn't very notable, we could leave this page as Cyclone Nisha. Or we could move this page to Cyclone Nisha (2008) with "Cyclone Nisha" redirecting here, if you agree on this. 76.235.208.170 (talk) 18:03, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

add (2008)

[edit]

The name Nisha is the next name on the south pacific list, but the name Nisha was also used in the 1992-93 south pacific season. I think the article should have had the (2008) before, but I don't think anyone recognized the 1992-93 cyclone. Should the (2008) be added now? 76.29.112.198 (talk) 00:46, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Done - I agree with the IP it should have the year on since the name Nisha has been used morethan once and even if they had retirement in this basin i doubt that Nisha would be a retired name.Jason Rees (talk) 03:15, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wait - should a disambiguation page also be made on this storm, knowing it was used two other times (as of now)?76.29.112.198 (talk) 00:47, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 11 external links on Cyclone Nisha (2008). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 11:02, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]