Jump to content

Talk:Cyclone Keila

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleCyclone Keila has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starCyclone Keila is part of the Arabian Peninsula tropical cyclones series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 9, 2016Good article nomineeListed
May 15, 2017Good topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Good article

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Cyclone Keila/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Wilhelmina Will (talk · contribs) 10:12, 7 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

GA criteria

[edit]
  • Well-written:

    • The article complies with MOS policies on grammar, as well as general layout. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 10:02, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    (a) the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct
    (b) it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation
  • Verifiable with no original research:

    • There are no signs of original research. The article uses many reputable sources, and makes frequent citations to them. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 10:01, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    (a) it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline
    (b) reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose)
    (c) it contains no original research
  • Broad in its coverage:

    • The article seems to cover all relevant aspects of its topic, without becoming trivial at any point. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 10:00, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    (a) it addresses the main aspects of the topic
    (b) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style)
  • Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.

    • The article's tone remains consistently neutral. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 09:59, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.

    • The only sort of disruptive editing in this article's history, at the current time, happened back in late 2011; it is at present stable. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 09:32, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:

    • All three images currently used in the article are public domain, so there is no risk of copyright violations. All three of them provide important illustration to the article as well, and all captions seem appropriate. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 09:31, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    (a) media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content
    (b) media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions

    I believe this article qualifies as GA. Congratulations! Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 10:02, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    [edit]

    Hello fellow Wikipedians,

    I have just modified 7 external links on Cyclone Keila. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

    When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

    This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

    • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
    • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

    Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 10:42, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Cyclone_Keila&oldid=1211216117"