Talk:Cyclone Hamoon

Cyclone Hamoon has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: September 19, 2024. (Reviewed version).

Bangladesh Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bangladesh, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bangladesh on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BangladeshWikipedia:WikiProject BangladeshTemplate:WikiProject BangladeshBangladesh articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Bangladesh To-do list:

Add more images to Bangladesh Liberation War and related pages
Clean up Climate change in Bangladesh, it needs a lot of work
Clean up History of Bangladesh after independence, it needs NPOV
Improve Bangladesh back to FA as it was demoted (see discussion)
Improve Bengali language back to FA as it was demoted (see discussion)
Improve Bengalis and related pages
Take a look at the requested articles.
Make a MRT line 3 article.
Extend, add an infobox and a map of New Eskaton to New Eskaton.

Weather: Tropical / North Indian Low‑importance

	Weather portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details. Articles Requested Project Resources Become a Member Project Talk Assessment A-Class Alerts WeatherWikipedia:WikiProject WeatherTemplate:WikiProject WeatherWeather articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Tropical cyclones portal This article is supported by WikiProject Tropical cyclones (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the North Indian Ocean work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Rename this page

Obviously NIO names are used only once, so move the page to the title "Cyclone Hamoon". Cuises123 (talk) 15:24, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 24 October 2023

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Standard practice for cyclones that have no other usages of the name, non-contentious request ~ Cyclonebiskit (chat) 20:01, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Cyclone Hamoon (2023) → Cyclone Hamoon – Obviously, there is no other cyclones with the same name. 49.130.128.2 (talk) 17:21, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support I agree with the IP, there were no other storm named "Hamoon" in the past and probably won't be another in the future as the NIO storm names do not repeat like other basins, so it does not make any sense to place "(2023)" in the name of the article.

TheWxResearcher (talk) 18:30, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Restrict this page

There is a possibility that vandalism might occur on this page because of a recent event. 2001:1970:4FA2:D000:A111:6B61:BA98:94E5 (talk) 18:33, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

We can’t assume that yet Insendieum (talk) 12:48, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Cyclone Hamoon (2023)" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Cyclone Hamoon (2023) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 May 19 § Cyclone Hamoon (2023) until a consensus is reached. Icarus58 (talk) 01:52, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]