Talk:Cyclone Evan
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
This page has been cited as a source by a notable professional or academic publication: A Case Study of Tropical Cyclone Evan around Samoa The World Meteorological Organization August 17, 2013. |
Requested Move to Cyclone Evan
[edit]While i appreciate that we normally wait for some confirmation that the name wont ever be used again, i really think that the Samoan damage thus far means that we should look at moving this article to Cyclone Evan as it is imo the most notable Evan out there.Jason Rees (talk) 05:41, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
- I don't think it really matters, since the CSD tag is already there, but for the record, I support this. Inks.LWC (talk) 06:42, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
- And there is going to be a lot more to this story. The IR scans from the past 12 hours indicate rainfall of biblical proportions across Western Samoa. Looie496 (talk) 07:34, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
Done Inks.LWC (talk) 07:49, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
Photos
[edit]Can someone double check me here - i believe that these images are able to be used on WP since the author states in French that they dont mind people using their images as long as we attribute them.Jason Rees (talk) 20:47, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
- Done - the author does state that the relaying of information is allowed with attribution. TheAustinMan(Talk·Works) 21:00, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
- They still have to be able to be used commercially even to be uploaded. What exactly is it that the website says in terms of image use permission? Inks.LWC (talk) 16:13, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
- When we looked at it the other day, it said they were happy for the Media and other people to use their images as long as they were attributed back.Jason Rees (talk) 19:16, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
- They still have to be able to be used commercially even to be uploaded. What exactly is it that the website says in terms of image use permission? Inks.LWC (talk) 16:13, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
Peak intensites
[edit]Just to clarify, the JTWC peaked at 125 kts at 00z last night while Nadi peaked @ 100 kts. Niether of which estimates justifies a Cat 5 rating.Jason Rees (talk) 17:19, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
Strongest TC to hit Fiji
[edit]We need to be very careful about saying that Evan was the strongest ever tropical cyclone to affect Fiji, since Cyclone Daman affected the archipelago at a similar intensity.Jason Rees (talk) 08:13, 21 December 2012 (UTC)
Damages
[edit]- Fiji: FJ$31 million -> US$31 million [1]
- Western Samoa: SAT236 million -> US$103 million PG 15
- American Samoa: None
UTC
[edit]I'm a bit confused as to why this is in here: "At 1800 UTC on December 11 (0700 UTC+13, December 12 [nb 1]), the United States Joint Typhoon Warning Center (JTWC) started to issue advisories on the system and designated it as Tropical Cyclone 04P...". The footnote says, "UTC+13 is equivalent to Tonga/Samoa standard time and Fiji/New Zealand Daylight saving time." I'm not understanding what the text in parentheses means. Inks.LWC (talk) 07:34, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
- With significant systems like this i feel that it is nice at times to include local time in addition to UTC, especially since we are dealing with the Samoas which are 24 hours apart.Jason Rees (talk) 08:46, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
- Then why not just use the local time zone abbreviation? I think that's what we've done on some of the EPAC/Atlantic storms. Inks.LWC (talk) 10:25, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
- Unlike in the Atlantic we are not dealing with just one local name for a timezone, so thus I think it is easier just to use the international one (UTC+13) and having the note, rather than picking one of FDST, WST, NZDT or TST to use.Jason Rees (talk) 10:57, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
- Then why not just use the local time zone abbreviation? I think that's what we've done on some of the EPAC/Atlantic storms. Inks.LWC (talk) 10:25, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
Dissipated
[edit]I would like to remind people that we have to be careful when we are dealing with the dissipation of remnants and stick to what we can prove via text rather than using satellite imagery. As a result, i have selected to use December 25 as the infobox's dissipation date and follow it up with a note in the MH saying that the remnants were last noted by TCWC Wellington on December 25, which will be sourced back to the subtropics marine weather bulletins for Dec 24 18z and Dec 25 06z. If a subsequent date for dissipation emerges in the end of month reports by NIWA, Wellington, FMS or BoM then i will be more than happy to use it.Jason Rees (talk) 08:03, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Cyclone Evan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.rnzi.com/pages/news.php?op=read&id=72833
- Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/6Czn8usNx?url=http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/hurricanes/archives/2012/h2012_Evan.html to http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/hurricanes/archives/2012/h2012_Evan.html
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.met.gov.fj/aifs_prods/Media%20release%202%20TD04F_Dec%2011%202012%20%281%29.pdf
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.meteo.nc/en-savoir-plus/accueil/actualites/266-evan
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10856047
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:33, 22 May 2017 (UTC)