Talk:Cyclone Alessia

Cyclone Alessia has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: March 12, 2014. (Reviewed version).

Weather: Tropical / Southern Hemisphere Low‑importance

	Weather portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details. Articles Requested Project Resources Become a Member Project Talk Assessment A-Class Alerts WeatherWikipedia:WikiProject WeatherTemplate:WikiProject WeatherWeather articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Tropical cyclones portal This article is supported by WikiProject Tropical cyclones (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Southern Hemisphere work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Australia: Western Australia Low‑importance

	Australia portal Cyclone Alessia is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Western Australia (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Western Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Cyclone Alessia (2013)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Hurricanehink (talk · contribs) 18:13, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"Tracking generally west to west-southwest" - not what the track map says. Also, why not say in the first sentence that it formed near Indonesia?
- First TWO by the JTWC and first noting as a TL by the BOM were on November 20; the track actually starts on November 19. Also, the location is based on the TWO, which doesn't mention Indonesia (nor the initial southerly track pre-TL stage). Cyclonebiskit (talk) 13:20, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
You should link what "a tropical cyclone" is, and what it means in this basin in the lede.
- Added a note clarifying. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 13:20, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
"roughly 1,465 km (910 mi) north of RAAF Learmonth in Western Australia" - again, why not indicate Indonesia? It's much closer than the nearly 1000 mile distance you have here.
- See previous reasoning Cyclonebiskit (talk) 13:20, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
"and prominent outflow which extended into the mid-latitude westerlies" - which --> that
- Done Cyclonebiskit (talk) 13:20, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
"A few hours later" - from when? The previous sentence said it moved generally eastward
- Reworded Cyclonebiskit (talk) 13:20, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
What is a "Category 1 tropical cyclone"? SSHS?
- Clarified Cyclonebiskit (talk) 13:20, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
"previously steering the storm east" - I think it should be "eastward", but your call
- I trust your judgement more than mine :P Changed Cyclonebiskit (talk) 13:20, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
"Northern Emergency Services acting regional manager, Krissy Riley, advised residents living in substandard housing to decide what public shelter they would use during the storm" - kinda trivial
- Removed Cyclonebiskit (talk) 13:20, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
"Further west" - any time it's a distance, it should be "farther". Remember, far = distance, so farther
- Fixed Cyclonebiskit (talk) 13:20, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
"Local authorities reported no serious traffic accidents in relation to the storm nor injuries" - we usually don't indicate when stuff doesn't happen
- Removed Cyclonebiskit (talk) 13:20, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Don't start two sentences with "Following" in the "Gulf of Carpentaria" section
- Reworded Cyclonebiskit (talk) 13:20, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
"No known damage took place in relation to Alessia's second landfall, likely due to the sparsely populated nature of the region." - this isn't covered by the source.
- Removed anyways based on your above comments. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 13:20, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

All in all, decent, just some stuff to be removed and small fixes. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 18:13, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]