Jump to content

Talk:Crossfeed

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Crossfeed. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:36, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Other meanings

[edit]

What about Crossfeed (X-Feed) on an aircraft? --ManuelNeuerFan1 (talk) 09:35, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Restoration comment

[edit]

Just wanted to clarify that I misread the edit summary, which said "unsourced since tag was place in 2015". It seems this meant that there were no new sources since 2015, which I misinterpreted as "no sources". The reference that DOES exist must've been added prior to 2015. In any case, one source is not ideal, and the article is not in great shape.

Yet, BLAR'ing does not seem to be the way here, as "crossfeed" has no mention or discussion at the general article for Stereophonic sound, so the page should be AfD'd, and/or merged-and-redirected as desired and as appropriate, not blanked-and-redirected. This is all in order to answer the question that people have when they search for this term, i.e.: yes we have information (merge any relevant content, and redirect), or no we do not (delete, no redirect). We do not want to mislead readers with unmentioned redirects, so I've restored the article in the meantime to be dealt with accordingly, if desired. Utopes (talk / cont) 21:37, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]