Talk:Cowl (oast)

Architecture Mid‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tags

I disagree with most of the tags on the article.

Expansion - Yes. Introduction could be expanded with more examples of other uses of cowls. More photos could be added.
Attention from an expert - No. I think that the sections on Construction and How does it work? should give the lay reader a good understanding of the subject.
[[wiki]] - No. There are not many pages that will need to link to this article. I created this article basically as a sub-page of the oast article so that it did not dominate that article. On both the maltings and brewery pages there is no illustration of a building with a cowl. A few places in Scotland may have watermills with kilns that have a cowl, but even there the vast majority of kilns had a louvred ventilator, not a cowl.
Additional citations fof verification - No. Three books are referenced, and three of the four external links are to webpages of the only two firms still making cowls, one of which still does so with the traditional materials, the other in fibreglass.

Therefore I ask that these tags be reviewed and either removed or reasons given as to why they should stay and what needs to be do to enable them to be removed. Mjroots (talk) 08:42, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Expansion - Yes. Not only intro, but subsections in Local variations also need to be expanded.
Attention from an expert - You can remove it.
[[wiki]] - Need more internal links.
Additional citations for verification - Please reference more books. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 08:55, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also cite the books in reference section carefully. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 08:59, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed the {{expert}} tag as discussed above. Will bear in mind what is said about expansion.

[[wiki]] - difficult to know where else to link to, unless I create articles for all terms mentioned in italics, which I think may be getting too specialised. Will certainly add photos of items that explain these terms if I find any suitable ones.
Additional citations for verification - There are very few books published on hop-picking, oasts or hopper huts. It is very much a minority subject. I have six books on these subjects, one of which is an expanded reprint of an earlier book, and only one of the six deals with the West Midlands. I'm not sure what is meant by cite books in reference section more carefully. Mjroots (talk) 14:36, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[[wiki]] - Still needed. Weatherboards etc. should be linked. There are other words also like ladder etc. unspecialised terms. Please link them also, especially which are relevant to housing.
Additional citations for verification - If you think no more book is published, you can remove it.
cite books in reference section more carefully means mention the ISBN, author etc. in the Reference section as you have done in the Sources section. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 15:43, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've wikified the sections, and removed all tags except expand. I think it is a duplication of effort to do what is suggested re the books. The title of the book is quoted, and full details of the book given below. This seems to be OK on plenty of other pages. Mjroots (talk) 16:52, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed the sentence that references an external drawing of the Cowl, as it 404's. Karanne (talk) 00:39, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cowl (oast). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:53, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]