Jump to content

Talk:Cookridge

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Location of Hospital

[edit]

I would dispute that Cookridge Hospital is/was nearer Horsforth than Cookridge. Since the hospital is near or in Tinshill, I'd suggest it's nearer Holt Park than Horsforth. Thoughts anyone? Ian - --Ormers (talk) 22:54, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Location of Horsforth railway station

[edit]

The Horsforth article says that the station is actually located on the Cookridge side of the Moseley beck. If that is correct does anyone know why it has the name Horsforth station? 20 August 2008 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.150.177.4 (talk) 22:05, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pictures

[edit]

I think the picture of the Jet2.com plane is now redundant. It is a picture of a plane and you can't see much in the background. We now have actual pictures.Chemical Engineer (talk) 23:03, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]


I agree, the picture served a meaningful purpose, whilst there were no better images on the page. Two of the pictures on this page show a general overview of the area, making the Jet2 image surplus to requirements. Mtaylor848 (talk) 18:01, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Cookridge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 16:23, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Cookridge/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

.
  1. Requires infobox
  2. Requires addition of inline references using one of the {{Cite}} templates
  3. Requires structuring of information
  4. Requires copy-edit for WP:MOS
Keith D 13:24, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 13:24, 30 October 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 12:15, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cookridge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:35, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cookridge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:41, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Tinshill and Ireland Wood

[edit]

It is obvious from Cole's books and general consideration that Tinshill and Ireland Wood are developments within the general area of Cookridge. After all, Cookridge Hospital is built in the wood known as Ireland Wood. Could we express this more elegantly in the lead? Chemical Engineer (talk) 16:37, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cookridge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:21, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Cookridge&oldid=1200057443"