Talk:Conflict: Middle East Political Simulator

Palestine Low‑importance

	Palestine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palestine, a team effort dedicated to building and maintaining comprehensive, informative and balanced articles related to the geographic Palestine region, the Palestinian people and the State of Palestine on Wikipedia. Join us by visiting the project page, where you can add your name to the list of members where you can contribute to the discussions.PalestineWikipedia:WikiProject PalestineTemplate:WikiProject PalestinePalestine-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Video games Start‑class Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Red Alert (video game) (2 participants)
Zero Hour (video game) (2 participants)
Drawn to Life (video game series) (1 participant)
Playmox (4 participants)
Chef RPG (1 participant)
Outfolded (4 participants)
NoFrag (2 participants)
VoxelStorm (1 participant)
GameRevolution (5 participants)
List of longest-running video game franchises (11 participants)
Free Internet Chess Server (10 participants; relisted)
Gilman Louie (3 participants; relisted)
Yoshimitsu (5 participants; relisted)
Emote (4 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Featured content candidates

Donkey Kong (nom)

Good article nominations

DYK nominations

Sun Haven

Reviews and reassessments

Articles that need...

Warning: active arbitration remedies

The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:

You must be logged-in and extended-confirmed to edit or discuss this topic on any page (except for making edit requests, provided they are not disruptive)
You may not make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on any edits related to this topic

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

Further information

The exceptions to the extended confirmed restriction are:

Non-extended-confirmed editors may use the "Talk:" namespace only to make edit requests related to articles within the topic area, provided they are not disruptive.
Non-extended-confirmed editors may not create new articles, but administrators may exercise discretion when deciding how to enforce this remedy on article creations. Deletion of new articles created by non-extended-confirmed editors is permitted but not required.

With respect to the WP:1RR restriction:

Clear vandalism of whatever origin may be reverted without restriction. Also, reverts made solely to enforce the extended confirmed restriction are not considered edit warring.
Editors who violate this restriction may be blocked by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offence.

After being warned, contentious topics procedure can be used against any editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process. Contentious topic sanctions can include blocks, topic-bans, or other restrictions.
Editors may report violations of these restrictions to the Arbitration enforcement noticeboard.

If you are unsure if your edit is appropriate, discuss it here on this talk page first. When in doubt, don't revert!

Untitled

I have just started programming a remake called Conflict.Net (http://www.senygaard.com/index.php?page=./pages/conflict_net.php)

Hi David, I (mail@senygaard.com) don't have your email address so I have to write to you here. I just was wondering if it was possible to send you a few questions about your role in the design of the original confMEPS? It won't be a long interview (many questions). I'd be happy if you found the time.

SEN

South Africa

I have removed the (South Africa) from the Private Arms Dealer statement because there is nothing in the game to suggest the arms dealer represents the South African government or military, his accent aside, and the military equipment offered by the private dealer is of Soviet, not South African origin. To clarify further, the way the sentence was structured previously implies the private arms dealers are selling South African weaponry on behalf of South Africa, which is contrary to the nature of a "private" arms dealer, in addition to the specific weaponry not being used by the South African military. --NEMT 19:51, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In the game it says (as you noted) that the seller has a South African accent. I have edited to reflect this. // Liftarn

Military - T-62 price

The text claims that

"Weapon types are identical as far as war is concerned, regardless of their price: so the 1M USD T-62 Main Battle Tank from the private dealer is exactly the same as the 2M USD M1A1 Main Battle Tank from the USA."

As far as I can see the price of th T-62 Main Battle Tank from the private dealer is 2M USD, not 1M USD as stated in the article. Does anybody else have similar experience or experience as in the article? Perhaps matter of different versions. I am refering to the abandonware version for PC.

The "light tanks" do in fact cost 1M USD. How these compare in battle to the 2M tanks is unclear to me. --212.242.146.114 13:00, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The line that mentioned the Private Arms dealer as a South African arms dealer was "with the private dealer (a South African national in the game) providing access to Russian weaponry.)"

I can kinda see the confusion here, however, private arms dealers would have to be sponsored by a government. I think mentioning that the Private Arms dealer is a pretty interesting note. Would there be a way to change the quote while removing the idea that he is providing Russian weaponry by a South African government?

edit* I have gone ahead and restructured the sentence to sound better.

- Klasanov

-Hi. No, the T-62 in Conflict is a "Main Battle Tank" and costs $2M and is essentially identical to the M1A1 Abrams, Chieftain, and AMX-30. By today's standards a T-62 would probably fall into "Light Tank" categories, but back in 1964 and 1973 it was an extremely fearsome piece of equipment, and it scared the West pretty good because it was extremely powerful with its 115mm gun, fast and agile, and very cheap to make and maintain. -jregley —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jregley (talk • contribs) 00:40, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pictures of arms?

I seem to recall that under the DOS version, a picture is displayed of the arms being purchased. Sometimes, it is not shown. Any ideas why and if there a different versions, maybe we should put a reference. 66.191.19.217 03:45, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I thought the Amiga version had pictures, but the DOS version does not. // Liftarn

I believe DOS had pictures to. There are data files with the names of the various arms in the DOS ver. 66.191.19.217 04:16, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

IIRC, the DOS version did, but not by default. I believe there was some setting. Surv1v4l1st ^{(Talk|Contribs)} 03:00, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

-I remember there being pictures in the original 5" floppy game version which I had about 17 years ago, so, yes, this is a valid claim. All the pictures were side-view black and white technical sheet diagrams, almost exactly like the diagrams that FAS.org has on their (quite excellent) site. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jregley (talk • contribs) 00:32, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Run from the floppy, the pictures show up by default. Run from an HD, they do not. Strange behaviour, but regardless, the MS-DOS version indeed have the diagrams in question. Might make for a decent screenshot in the appropriate section. Surv1v4l1st ^{(Talk|Contribs)} 15:21, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Conflictscreenshot.gif

Image:Conflictscreenshot.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 06:50, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lebanon

Not entirely hopeless. I actually played one game where Lebanon was really jammy. Syria was already at war with 2 countries (or it might even have been 3) and Lebanon put troops on the border and used its single brigade to conquer the whole of Syria! Very funny. Even more funny was that it actually ended up being Israel's sole surviving opponent. BillMasen (talk) 09:10, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I realized that Lebanon has a fighting chance when I played the game a couple of weeks back. I was busy with two wars against Egypt and Jordan (or was it Syria?) when Lebanon decided to declare war on Israel. Naturally, I posted a brigade on the Lebanese border, but on the next turn, it was Game Over, as Lebanon just kicked me out of the game. - Areaseven (talk) 05:17, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WP:VGSCOPE

I and a couple other users involved in WikiProject Video games have noticed that this article suffers from gamecruft and needs a major cleanup. Who's willing to do this? jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk • contribs) 16:05, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]