Talk:Confederation of Planes and Planets

This article was nominated for deletion on 1 January 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

List of Minecraft characters (4 participants)
Carlton Wilborn (4 participants)
Cossacks (video games series) (2 participants)
Rat Race (video game) (7 participants)
Red Barrels (3 participants)
TheoTown (12 participants; relisted)
Old Grandma Hardcore (6 participants; relisted)
Zero Hour (video game) (6 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Untitled

I copied over the talk pages from both Avlis and Arkaz to keep their history

Avlis

This article was nominated for deletion on 17 June 2008. The result of the discussion was keep.

Notability Criteria

Can we get an idea of what would be considered notability here?

As we have world campaign settings such as Arcanis or Kingdoms of Kalamar and their living campaigns as part of the wikipedia and Dungeons and Dragons category, I believe that we have sufficient ground with Avlis as being a notable campaign setting based persistent world through the Neverwinter Nights engine to be considered part of this sub-category.-- NobAkimoto

Arkaz

Notability Criteria

Can we get an idea of what would be considered notability here?

As we have world campaign settings such as Arcanis or Kingdoms of Kalamar and their living campaigns as part of the wikipedia and Dungeons and Dragons category, I believe that we have sufficient ground with ARkaz as being a notable campaign setting based persistent world through the Neverwinter Nights engine to be considered part of this sub-category.-- Terryrayc (talk) 14:34, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Have a look at WP:WEB, it describes in detail what is considered notability criteria for web content (which this falls under as it is solely on the internet, as per the notability page itself). The fact that Wikipedia has other similar articles is not an argument for keeping this one - are you sure those other articles are notable enough for Wikipedia, or is it just that nobody has nominated them for deletion yet? -Lilac Soul ^{(talk • contribs • count)} 14:45, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That's what we're debating about, if these site s are norable enough to stand on their own or if we're better off making a combined page so they stand together. Terryrayc (talk) 17:15, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment as of 2009-01-01

Downgrading to stub-class. There is, quite literally, hardly any material here, nor any proper citations. It's bad enough that I would consider recommending it for merging or deletion, as it doesn't look like there's enough notability for it to be a stand-alone item. There just isn't any material here to warrant an article that I can see.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 21:25, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the input. As it is, there is no separate Wikipedia article spanning all notable persistent worlds in Neverwinter Nights wherefore there is nothing to merge this one with. It can remain as a stub. --VoidHamlet (talk) 16:48, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This article is a murge of several smaller articles. While it needs clean up it was already talked about and decided it meets the notability requirements to keep. Terryrayc (talk) 02:54, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Avlis header.gif

The image File:Avlis header.gif is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --17:30, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Um I'm guessing it meets fairuse because the image is owned by the person who posted it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Terryrayc (talk • contribs) 18:12, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]