Talk:Coiled tubing

	Energy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Technology

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles

I suggest we remove the list of "Major coiled tubing services companies", which leans more towards advertizing. Neither the Wireline page nor the Snubbing page has such a list. InsanePervert (talk) 16:12, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why? Wikipedia provides the latest information but the companies show pictures/animations of the equipment and in some instances give case studies on capabilities. Unless the link is there, we have to search again. I find it very useful. Perhaps wireline and snubbing need a similar link. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.69.16.174 (talk) 13:42, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

About CTU

I think we need a separate item for this. Also, the air compressor on the unit is sometimes used to 'blow air into well'? I don't think so. The compressor comes along with the generator, which cools down the unit.
The categorizes of CTU applications don't seem good to me, either...
DairyKnight (talk) 22:33, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

We should mention the freely downloadable Norsok standards that give guidance D-SR-005 Coiled tubing equipment Rev 1 Jan 1996 D-SR-008 Wireline equipment Rev 1 Oct 1996 D-010 Well integrity in drilling and well operations Rev 3 Aug 2004 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.69.16.174 (talk) 21:46, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Coiled tubing. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140729175205/http://www.coiledtubingdrilling.com/ctd/coiled-tubing/technology/ to http://www.coiledtubingdrilling.com/ctd/coiled-tubing/technology/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:53, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction is too complicated and long

The introduction here reads like a paragraph in the middle of an article. It should start with a simple summary, not this long compare and contrast with other methods.

--Epididymus (talk) 00:16, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]