Talk:Clapboard

Architecture Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Polyvinyl chloride#Unplasticized polyvinyl chloride (uPVC)|uPVC]] The anchor (#Unplasticized polyvinyl chloride (uPVC)) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

This article is lacking a certain something?

and it should truly be hight: "weatherboard" first over "clapboard" — Preceding unsigned comment added by 5.69.58.27 (talk) 22:38, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Although Clapboard has an American bias I am happy with the title because America has a strong tradition of wooden buildings and the rest of the world knows what clapboard is. The article seems to be well balanced. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jemmans (talk • contribs) 08:36, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Stained

The photo captioned that the boards are "stained dark brown", that looks much more like natural unpainted wood that has darkened from UV exposure. That's what happens when you use plain untreated wood for siding, that why old barns look dark brown or black, and that's why it's streaky, with parts still showing blond and others turning dark. If it stained it was carefully done to replicate the natural aging effect. Idumea47b (talk) 13:01, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]