Talk:Church of England parish church

Christianity: Anglicanism High‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Anglicanism (assessed as Top-importance).

England High‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Architecture Mid‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Notable

As most CofE churches are notable in some way, I suggest that those listed here are only the very most notable of all, preferably only those given three, four or five stars in Jenkins' 'England's Thousand Best Churches' Verica Atrebatum 23:18, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

While I share your concern about the list growing too long, I think you are possibly applying a rather limited criterion in only considering the architecture of churches. And should we just be lifting from another work, or making our own judgement? So I'm adding a little bit of text to why (in my opinion - and I know it can be edited back out!) churches might be considered of interest, and adding a few examples. Grblundell 08:45, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What you've added looks good to me. I do feel some criteria need to be set in order to prevent overpopulation. I suggested Jenkins' book might help, largely because it is very widely available and pretty good at classifying what is notable. However, as you say, he is mostly interested in architecture and fittings, less so in location, modern or historical connections, etc. Let's see what other people think. There may not be a problem anyway. Verica Atrebatum 15:48, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest that each entry should have a clear statement of its claim to notability, together with a citation. I have removed the rather superfluous (pov) comment defining notability. Abtract (talk) 17:22, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Definition

"the smallest and most basic Church of England administrative region, known as a parish."

Is that true? How does it relate to the district, into which many larger parishes are divided? I've served on district church councils, as well as parish and deanery bodies, and it seemed that a district council had administrative and financial functions. Probably truer to say that the parish was traditionally the basic local unit of the church, but more diverse structures have evolved, especially since the hollowing out of city centre parishes resulted in numerous mergers from the 1960's onward. The idea of a uniform parish system has heuristic value as a standard for comparison, but only very limited historical validity. The royal peculiars, with their anomalous jurisdictions over many local churches, didn't disappear until the 1840's, so the parish system only triumphed just in time to become obsolete. Sjwells53 (talk) 19:30, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Can you edit the article to this effect, backed up by references? Amandajm (talk) 23:41, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non parochial areas and parishes not in dioceses

"there are very few non-pariochial areas and some parishes not in dioceses"

And - tantalisingly - no list or examples. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.232.34.78 (talk) 22:49, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Church of England parish church. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110716060303/http://www.lichfield.anglican.org/news%26newsID%3D531 to http://www.lichfield.anglican.org/news%26newsID%3D531

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:42, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Church of England parish hurch" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Church of England parish hurch. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Regards, SONIC678 14:51, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]