Talk:Chris LaCivita

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Military

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the military biography work group.

Conservatism Low‑importance

	Conservatism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Virginia Low‑importance

	Virginia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Virginia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Virginia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VirginiaWikipedia:WikiProject VirginiaTemplate:WikiProject VirginiaVirginia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Someone just replaced the article with new but possibly accurate material Dec 2006

Someone just replaced the existing article with what looks like Chris LaCivita's official PR bio: [1]

I am reverting this change--no published source of encyclopedia quality is offered for even one of its many statements of fact. If such sources are in print or on the web, such material would be useful, assuming one also removed the inappropriate pro-LaCivita POV.

On the other hand, the anti-LaCivita POV of the existing article is just as inappropriate. I'm flagging it in the hope others will improve it. betsythedevine 20:28, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

---Believe the article has been corrected. Outdated, inaccurate information was there. There's a link to the official bio at Crosslink Strategy. Just because we don't like someone's politics is no reason to allow old, outdated information to stand in its place. I'll look for additional sources and add to the bio.User:MediaLizzy 26 December 2006

Just because we do or don't like someone's politics is no reason to remove accurate information about his public statements and appearances in the press. Wikipedia's standard for what's an appropriate source of encyclopedia quality doesn't include anyone's "official bio" on a company website. WP:NOR Please find and cite appropriate sources for each fact about LaCivita you want to add. WP:REF Please refrain from adding items with no such pedigree. Feel free to update "old" information, for example by mentioning that George Allen lost his Senate seat in 2006. betsythedevine 02:52, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Betsy - you have blogged extensively about Terry Nelson and LaCivita. You most definitely do not have a NPOV. Adding citations regarding LaCivita without disclosure of this fact nullifies your arguments for Fairness. There is no citation for the information regarding the civil suit associated with the Tobin case. Please provide. User:MediaLizzy 27 December 2006

Fairness is not nullified--neither is Wikipedia policy--because you question the motivation of other editors. Wikipedia is not edited by nuns meditating in mountaintop convents about pure air--it's edited by enthusiasts who try (sometimes unsuccessfully) to write balanced unprejudicial information about people they may well have POV about. The best source for information about the civil suit associated with the phone-jamming is the Manchester Union Leader, which unfortunately puts articles behind a paid firewall within a few weeks after their appearance. I am not the author of, or even a major contributor to, Wikipedia's Phonegate article, if that's the article you're asking for citations on. The Boston Globe has some still-online coverage of its resolution: [2] Look, there's no reason for you and me to fight. I'd like the article on Chris LaCivita to be informative and neutral in tone. Right now, it's lurching from side to side, between political polemic against him and a biography puffing up his successes while failing to mention other parts of his history. betsythedevine 23:28, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

New addition of flattering material with no citation of encyclopedia-quality source, October 2007

Here's a puzzling addition by an unregistered user whose only interest seems to be this biography, 68.48.142.107. No citation is given for its multiple claims. The material seems to be original research in addition to problems with WP:NPOV. I removed the material, its author Undid my removal. I'll post a note on the user's Talk Page about this matter. betsythedevine 12:25, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Contested addition: Chris was born in suburban Pittsburgh, Pa., his father's hometown. His mother, a suburban Philadelphia girl and graduate of Archbishop Prendergast High School in Upper Darby, met his father at Villanova University, where they both worked for the Catholic Library Association. Chris' father, a Duquesne University graduate and public relations executive, moved the family from Pittsburgh to Bon Air, Va., an affluent, leafy suburb of Richmond, when Chris was 12. He and his brothers, having attended Catholic schools from first to eighth grades, attended Midlothian High School in the neighboring village of Midlothian, Va. Chris was raised in a traditional home and taught traditional values by his parents, who stressed the importance of faith, integrity, honesty, and charity.

'Code Pink and the rest of the liberal weirdos"

A Chris LaCivita quote that is neither "unsourced" nor "poorly sourced" has now twice been removed from this article. In response to criticism of GOP actions, LaCivita described his intended response: "When are we going to make it about Code Pink and the rest of the liberal weirdos controlling the Democrat agenda?" [3] To my mind, this quote illuminates the kind of scorched-earth polaraization politics that has characterized LaCivita's career. Somebody has now twice removed this quote with the explanation that it is "self agrandizing." There is no policy I know that requires the removal of boastful quotes if they are attributed and inside quotation marks. Could some third party comment on this dispute? 05:44, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chris LaCivita. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:58, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Donald Trump

when Joe Biden comes after you guys I will worship the ground you will be under 2601:589:4988:F850:9B44:3E03:CAA7:E774 (talk) 16:42, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand this comment; it looks like vandalism. If no one objects, I will delete it. Chillowack (talk) 05:59, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Arlington National Cemetery incident

In the "Arlington National Cemetery incident" section, it is claimed that Chris LaCivita and Steven Cheung were the Trump staffers who assaulted the cemetery employee. I checked the five articles cited, and as far as I can tell, none of them supports that claim.

Based on other articles I've read, I believe the two staffers in question were different individuals; and it is my intention to edit the section accordingly. But I would like to first allow time for other editors to weigh in, if anyone has evidence supporting the current claim (or if I may have missed something in my reading of the five articles). Please feel free to weigh in here, if you would like to present evidence that the current claim is accurate. Thanks and happy editing! Chillowack (talk) 19:15, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]