Talk:Chitradurga Fort

Chitradurga Fort was a Warfare good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
April 11, 2010	Good article nominee	Not listed

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on June 27, 2009.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Chitradurga Fort (pictured) in Karnataka has so many interconnecting tanks to harvest rain water, it was said it never ran out of water?

India: Karnataka / History Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Karnataka (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by the Indian history workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).

Military history: Fortifications / Asian / Indian / South Asia / Medieval B‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

B

This article has been rated as B-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Fortifications task force
	Asian military history task force
	Indian military history task force
	South Asian military history task force
	Medieval warfare task force (c. 500 – c. 1500)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Chitradurga Fort/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 02:54, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Overall this is an okay article, though I found a few concerns:

You interchange Chitradurga Fort and Chitradurga fort when discussing it; stick with the former.
- Done now.
"Chitradurga fort lies in the midst of valley formed by the Vedavati River" huh? like a valley in the river? reword.
- Changed
"Features of massive rock hills and scenic valleys, huge towering boulders in inconceivable shapes are seen in the fort precincts" Using a term like 'inconceivable' would need a citation.
- Removed word ‘inconcieivable’
Don't use "til"; use until, more encyclopedic.
- Changed
"was the founder ruler in the hierarchy of the Nayakas of Chitradurga." Stick with either founder or first ruler.
- First ruler used
The list of rulers probably isn't needed, since the article's about the fort, not the empire's history.
- List is removed
"At times he had allied himself with Hyder Ali of Mysore Kingdom and at other times with the Marathas" Who? Nayaka? Then he's be allying with the enemy, that makes no sense.
- Reformed the sentence
"But Hyder Ali attacked the Chitradurga Fort first time in 1760, the second time in 1770 and the third time successfully in 1779 when he defeated Madakari Nayaka, took him a prisoner and also killed him." Huh? I only partially understand some of this.
- Reconstructed the sentence
I don't get why the coins are in a blockquote.
- Removed the quote
"It was during one such war that the heroics of Onake Obavva, the wife of a soldier guarding the fort became a legendary event." You mention this a couple lines below, no need to duplicate.
- Removed the duplicate sentence
"Chitradurga became a part of Mysore province and ruled from Mysore." Second part's a little redundant.
- Done
"In this process, she bravely killed several enemy soldiers, one by one without any hubbub" At least try to make the prose encyclopedic.
- Chnaged the sentence
"Its architecture was thus primarily defensive in design." redundant, this is mentioned many times previously.
- Removed
"But they now show deterioration." Try to avoid fragmenty sentences like this, combine them with others or reword.
- Formed a full sentence
Legend/Feature films/Spiderman sections need a cite.
- Spideman section deleted. Legend section is based on intelinked article Hidimbi
Going off of that, I really question the point of the Spiderman section and would prefer removal.
- Removed
You're going to need someone to copyedit this one. The prose and punctuation are just not at GA-level right now.
- I am requesting Dr Blofeld for editing before renominating the article on GAN

Admittedly after reading this, I realized that I honestly struggled to get through it and make sense of it. That, combined with the prose and referencing issues, is a red flag. As a result, I am failing this article as a GA. If you can get someone to rewrite it and fix the issues, then it can be brought back to GAN. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 03:47, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have noted the review comments and revised the article complying to all observations. I am requesting Dr. Blofeld for editing.--Nvvchar (talk) 07:34, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Chitradurga Fort. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:05, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I added this info to the Tourism section: "The fort is located at a distance of about 180 kilometers from Bangalore." I gave a reference to my personal website and the reference was removed. But the sentence remains there. Ideally, a reference should be added for the factual info that speaks about distance. I received a message saying the reference is inappropriate as "Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites." I don't think my reference was inappropriate as it is a personal travel blog written after a factual visit with actual kilometers to the Fort recorded. The same article was carried out by a city lifestyle magazine too. Request you to please approve this reference:^[1]Sanskritysinha (talk) 06:25, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Editors should never add reference links to their personal website, and a blog is almost never a reliable source. --bonadea contributions talk 18:03, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ Chitradurga Fort distance from Bangalore

[1] Chitradurga Fort distance from Bangalore

[1]