Jump to content

Talk:Chinese school

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Biggest Chinese school in US

[edit]

The claim that St. Louis Modern Chinese School is the biggest Chinese school in US might not be correct. According the the home page of the school, it currently has 400 students. However, Berryessa Chinese School in San Jose, California, has over 1000 students.

Johannsebbach (talk) 01:58, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have to agree with that. I don't live in either of those places, I'm in Los Angeles. But St. Louis has just 400, while San Jose beat them with a whopping 1,300. I just removed that line for now. Dasani 05:44, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently inaccurate redirect

[edit]

The search term "si shu" redirects here. After reading the entry, I feel this page doesn't seem to have a lot to do with the sort of traditional Confucian education one would receive at a 私塾. If the same word is used today to describe modern Chinese schools, a section should probably be added to detail the roots of the word and/or the original system of instruction. 173.79.69.233 (talk) 21:33, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 17 February 2017

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: revert to status quo, which is what should have happened at RM/TR over a week ago... Anyway, once that's done no prejudice against starting a new RM. I think George makes some interesting points. Jenks24 (talk) 06:49, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Overseas Chinese schoolChinese school – Per WP:COMMONNAME, this is controversial and needs to be discussed Lemongirl942 (talk) 10:54, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is a contested technical request (permalink). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 11:39, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Anthony Appleyard:, this was a request to revert a bold move from Chinese school to Overseas Chinese school. As such, the page should be moved back to the statusquo Chinese school and then the move request should be started. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 13:14, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I agree. The move a few days ago requires discussion and consensus. I believe Chinese school is the common name for this type of school, at least in the US, and I've never seen one called an "overseas Chinese school," except maybe in China, and only if the school primarily serves Overseas Chinese (華僑), or "people of Chinese descent living outside China." Chinese schools in the US, especially Confucius Institutes, serve everyone, not just overseas Chinese. Phlar (talk) 13:38, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, it should be moved back to Chinese school, its long standing location. Then if anyone things it needs to be at this address a RM is required, but I can’t see that succeeding as above: the common name in English speaking countries is "Chinese school".--JohnBlackburnewordsdeeds 13:52, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chinese school. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:05, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]