Talk:Chew Valley Lake

Chew Valley Lake is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.

This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on May 3, 2006.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
January 30, 2006	Peer review	Reviewed
February 12, 2006	Good article nominee	Listed
February 12, 2006	Featured article candidate	Not promoted
March 2, 2006	Featured article candidate	Promoted
September 27, 2008	Featured topic candidate	Promoted
February 6, 2021	Featured article review	Demoted
September 24, 2021	Featured topic removal candidate	Demoted
Current status: Former featured article

Lakes Mid‑importance

	Lakes portal Chew Valley Lake is within the scope of WikiProject Lakes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of lake-related articles on Wikipedia, using the tools on the project page. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LakesWikipedia:WikiProject LakesTemplate:WikiProject LakesLakes articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

England Mid‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

UK geography Mid‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article needs a map.
	This article needs census data.

Somerset Low‑importance

	Somerset portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Somerset, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Somerset on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SomersetWikipedia:WikiProject SomersetTemplate:WikiProject SomersetSomerset articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Older comments

I have cleaned this up a very little bit, and removed a few peacock terms such as "outstanding natural beauty". it still reads rather more like a tourist flyer than an encyclopedia article to me. DES ^(talk) 16:47, 24 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

IS "Area of Outstanding NB" a DEFRA designation?Rich Farmbrough 14:54 5 March 2006 (UTC).

AONB is designated by the Countryside Agency on behalf of Uk government Rod 17:34, 5 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've done some clean up & tried to remove the flowery language - can anyone help with further clean up or can I remove the clean up tag?Rod 16:52, 24 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Some of the ISBNs in the bibliography are incorrect. All ISBNs should be 10 or 13 digits without spaces. Joe D (t) 22:15, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure the bit about "No spaces" is correct. I thought that the spaces are important parts of the ISBN, i.e. 1 234 56789 0 is a different ISBN from 1 2345 6789 0. Can you point me at a source which says they should be omitted? SP-KP 22:26, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The ISBN pages suggests they're redundant, and AFAICT the Wikimedia software (and most/all?) online bookstores omit them. Joe D (t) 22:29, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

They are, I believe, redundant, but not meaningless. 1st group says the language, second the publisher, third is a serial, fourth is a checksum. When you're into it, you can "read" a seperated ISBN. Rich Farmbrough 14:53 5 March 2006 (UTC).

snipe

This should probably be Common Snipe, Gallinago gallinago, but if it is intended to include Jack Snipe, that is not a Gallinago species, jimfbleak 08:58, 27 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks - corrected Rod 09:34, 27 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Featured Article

I don't know why the featured article star isn't coming up at the top of the page. I tried to fix it but I don't want to over edit the page with something that might not work. So if someone would fix that, that would be great. RENTA^{FOR LET?} 04:30, 3 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Chew Valley Lake map.PNG

map needs scale added. --Duk 07:19, 3 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Denny Island

As I'm not sure why the following addition was made, I moved it here:

For Denny Island, the small island in the Severn estuary, see that article.

- User:Docu

File:Mallard in flight.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Mallard in flight.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 01:44, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

FA tune-up

Rodw: Hi! I've stopped in because we are re-assessing our oldest FAs to ensure they meet modern FA standards. This article is in great shape for a featured article from 2006, though—you have clearly been keeping an eye on it—so I've just made a few very small fixes. The only issues I see are some deadlinks that might be replaceable (see [1]). Thank you for being the rare nominator that is still watching his articles 8 years on! (and n.b. - the Valley article will soon be up for the same informal tune-up as well). Maralia (talk) 19:02, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your comments - was it really 8 years ago. I've fixed or replaced some of the deadlinks & it has made me feel I need to go and check some of the other FAs I was involved in years ago.— Rod ^talk 20:05, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the quick action on the deadlinks! Everything looks good, so I'm going to cross this one off the list and move on to the Valley article. Maralia (talk) 23:26, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chew Valley Lake. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080706120237/http://www.bristolwater.co.uk/leisure/chewIndex.asp to http://www.bristolwater.co.uk/leisure/chewIndex.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:05, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Chew Valley Lake. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:05, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chew Valley Lake. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://archive.is/20130114015703/http://www.thisisbristol.co.uk/news/Changes-Chew-Valley-Explorer/article-1009122-detail/article.html to http://www.thisisbristol.co.uk/news/Changes-Chew-Valley-Explorer/article-1009122-detail/article.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:55, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

FA criteria

Large parts of the article have no references, failing verifiability requirements in the FA criteria. (t · c) buidhe 03:11, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Rodw: are you able to bring this to WP:WIAFA current standards? SandyGeorgia (Talk) 07:43, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have moved house and am no longer local which also means I don't have access to all the resources (this also applies to Chew Valley) so unless someone else takes it on, then probably not.— Rod ^talk 08:15, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]