Wikipedia:Featured article review/Chew Valley Lake/archive1
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was delisted by Nikkimaria via FACBot (talk) 1:06, 6 February 2021 (UTC) [1].
- Notified: Rodw, WP Somerset, WP Lakes, WP England, WP UK geography, 2020-11-23
Review section
[edit]This 2006 promotion doesn't meet the current standards. There's large amounts of uncited text throughout, and some of the material is potentially outdated, such as the bit starting with "During 2005–2006 Bristol Water started restoring two artificial islands." in the birdwatching section. There's also a self-published source cited (Hucker), and the sailing section is entirely about a single organization and that material is only cited to that organization's website, which raises some due weight concerns given the level of detail given. Hog Farm Bacon 02:09, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- AS the original primary author of this article I agree that it no longer meets current standards.— Rod talk 08:52, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Move to FARC - doesn't seem to have garnered any interest. Hog Farm Bacon 17:24, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Move to FARC - no progress, the original author is responsive but mentioned they are unavailable to help update the article. Deltawk (talk) 04:06, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
FARC section
[edit]- Issues raised in the review section include sourcing and currency. Nikkimaria (talk) 21:19, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist - Not particularly close to standards. Hog Farm Talk 02:11, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist - Article needs lots of work. Deltawk (talk) 00:15, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist needs improvement to meet the current standards. (t · c) buidhe 01:02, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This removal candidate has been delisted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please leave the {{featured article review}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Nikkimaria (talk) 21:06, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.