Talk:Charlie Craggs

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

LGBTQ+ studies

This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies articles

Doctor Who Low‑importance

	Doctor Who portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Doctor Who, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Doctor Who and its spin-offs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this notice, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Doctor WhoWikipedia:WikiProject Doctor WhoTemplate:WikiProject Doctor WhoDoctor Who articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This page was proposed for deletion by an editor in the past.

Notability

Self publishing online writer, no secondary sources confirming their notability and the background sources and info seemed to be unverifiable GavinMansfield (talk) 00:24, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I recommended page deletion GavinMansfield (talk) 00:24, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

All of the above are incorrect. Replying in detail at your talk page. Capewearer (talk) 13:40, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article is now well sourced with reliable, secondary sources. She's not self-published. Everything in the article is now verifiable. Capewearer (talk) 16:44, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Self publicity?

The only content in the article is publicising the subject. It reads as a brief CV and, whilst possibly a useful reference for a job application, it contains almost no other information about the subject, such as would be normal in an encyclopaedia entry.

Publicity articles such as this adversely affect Wikipedia's standing as a potential reference work.

Having followed up the few links and the material to which they lead this is starting to look even more like a hollow self-publicity effort.

One link turns out to be to a web site created as an undergraduate fashion college project (described as a 'campaign') which has had no further content added in the years since creation. It is about nail fashion. Another is about a published 'book', which is a short assemblage of letters written by other people with little editorial input. The article that mentions the book appears to be potentially by a self-publicity accomplice, whose main other achievement seems to be an Instagram account.

There is no other biographical material, such as early life, education, employment, no date of birth, no personal section, family / relationships, etc.

This Wikipedia article fits neatly into the pattern of creating a minor set of self-referencing material as an act of publicity, probably originally a 'clever idea' for an undergraduate project. There appears to be no notable achievement otherwise. This really is an example of using a fundamental weakness of Wikipedia for personal ends.

Website down

The website link leads to the domain host. If not temporary I suggest removing the link from the page. --89.139.132.207 (talk) 19:11, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Removed as it is down, yes—feel free to do this yourself in future. — Bilorv (talk) 20:10, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]