Talk:Cathubodua

Mythology Low‑importance

	Mythology portal This article is supported by WikiProject Mythology. This project provides a central approach to Mythology-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the WikiProject page for more details.MythologyWikipedia:WikiProject MythologyTemplate:WikiProject MythologyMythology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Celts Low‑importance

	Cathubodua is within the scope of WikiProject Celts, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the ancient Celts and the modern day Celtic nations. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article or you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks or take part in the discussion. Please Join, Create, and Assess.CeltsWikipedia:WikiProject CeltsTemplate:WikiProject CeltsCelts articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

France Low‑importance

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Gaul Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Gaul, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Gaul on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GaulWikipedia:WikiProject GaulTemplate:WikiProject GaulGaul articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

etymology

I added an explanation of the probable Gaulish meaning of the name Cathubodua. Until now, the article's explanation was based on speculation and original research. The University of Wales does not seem to equate the Gaulish name with proto-celtic *Katu-bodwā, rather some editor of wikipedia does so. While this leap is reasonable, it does not seem to be demonstrated by litterature. Note that I've found at least one case where proto-celtic *bodwà is translated as crow, though I don't consider that source reliable.

I also deleted speculation on badbd and therefore bodua being derived from the presence of crows (and other scavengers) on battlefields. This is pure speculation and was so far unsourced.

I was tempted to remove mention of Boudina and Boudiga in the intro, but unfortunately this seems to be sourced. The problem with these two names is that they seem to be based on a different Gaulish and even proto-celtic word, namely boudi and *boudi (victory, gain, profit), maybe also related to budina and *bùdinà (band, army). But again, this is also speculation and has no place in the article.

On the other hand one could add Cassibodua Gaulish apparent war goddess.--85.93.206.159 (talk) 11:55, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Good work. Yes, Boudina and Boudiga have been linked to Catubodua by real scholars in published works; however, if you can find a reference that disputes this identification, I'd welcome seeing a mention of it as well. (I agree with you, Jufer and Luginbühl are probably not right in this matter.) From what I've seen, Cassibodua is also based upon a single inscription, which is so fragmentary that (in my opinion) the very name should be considered speculative. Q·L·1968 ☿ 22:18, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Move from Catubodua to Cathubodua

This page should move to Cathubodua. The original inscription has an H, and there's no reason for us to 'correct' it. The sources cited in the article also use the H. Q·L·1968 ☿ 21:33, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I believe this is should be an uncontroversial move; however, I can't do it because Cathubodua (a redirect page) has an edit history. It's a pretty trivial edit history, however—from 6 March 2007‎ to 15 April 2007‎, an article of this name authored by User:T@nn consisted of two sentences, a reference, and some categories. Nothing wrong with it, but pretty thin. I think that {{db-move}} is the right procedure, but I guess my proposal there will get shot down if this is too bold! Q·L·1968 ☿ 16:15, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, that was incredibly fast turnaround! Thanks, User:Cyde! (Or was it User:Chrislk02?) I've now moved the page to Cathubodua and updated the template that provided most of the links to Catubodua (which should stick around as a redirect). Q·L·1968 ☿ 16:26, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Cathubodua. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110719103520/http://edh-www.adw.uni-heidelberg.de/offen/suchen2.html?hdnr=039253 to http://edh-www.adw.uni-heidelberg.de/offen/suchen2.html?hdnr=039253

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 12:09, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]