Talk:CIS Tower

	Greater Manchester portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greater Manchester, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greater Manchester on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Greater ManchesterWikipedia:WikiProject Greater ManchesterTemplate:WikiProject Greater ManchesterGreater Manchester articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Skyscrapers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skyscrapers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles that relate to skyscrapers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkyscrapersWikipedia:WikiProject SkyscrapersTemplate:WikiProject SkyscrapersSkyscraper articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Energy Low‑importance

	Energy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Architecture Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tube of Justice

Tube of Justice? What's that all about then if it's legendary? --Gavinio 16:00, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I can't find anything about this, and have never heard of it even though I used to work there! --82.152.170.60 21:55, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Me too - that was my point - let me ask around... --Gavinio 11:40, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

23 October 2006: Still hardly any info, Google ( http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Tube+of+Justice%22+CIS )points to a blog that references it. Sounds like on this Stephen Riley, a CIS worker knows about it. If it really is infamous it should be explained a bit better or cited, otherwise removed.

"3:11am - While sinking deeper into sadness I looked up the CIS Tower entry on Wikipedia and by chance, someone has just removed the Tube of Justice reference this Saturday afternoon. For god's sake, I'm looking at the dam thing now!!! The tube of justice exists... who dares edit that from that page? Whoever it was is stupid enough to believe that there is a nuclear bunker under the tower anyway, unless they know something about -B6. *FURY* Time for another Pro Plus." ( http://www.steriley.com/152/serving_hard_time/ )

So what is it? and can you provide any references? If this is just an in-joke it has no place in Wikipedia imho Zanzare 00:18, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed the "tube of justice" as I can't find any references to it except for reprints of this page. It therefore fails the Notability test. Zanzare 12:47, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I tracked down the author of that blog entry on Twitter, and he confirmed it was an in-joke. The web developers used a Jaffa Cake tube to select the name of the guy who had to do the late shift when a big publish was needed. A post-it on the packet read "Tube of Justice". It's right that this was taken down. Almagpie (talk) 20:36, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Would you kindly replace the word clad? This isn't a fashion show it's a building and we have plenty of words in the English language that are more suitable. Also, I don't like the sentence involving the directos, it makes it sound as if they retrofitted the walls themselves... All in all the article is quite poorly written; it reads more like a mediocre essay than something you'd expect from an encyclopedia. You need education! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.190.20.35 (talk) 12:32, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've tidied this bit up. Perhaps you could create an account (it takes 30 seconds) and edit yourself in future if you feel so strongly about it. Also, save the personal attacks. This is a community effort, and nobody is getting paid. Thanks Almagpie (talk) 20:44, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Also "clad" and "cladding" are commonly used building terms, as well as clad being a poetic English word for "dressed". Almagpie (talk) 10:59, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Seagram Tower

...is in New York City, not Chicago. --76.17.125.92 03:54, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Currency Change

Perhaps, since the building in question is in the USA, and not Great Britain, the currency should be changed to United States Dollars. I personally don't know how to do this, but maybe someone who does...?--EthanSoll 13:19, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

CIS Tower is in Manchester, England :-S Pit-yacker 15:34, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Right, sorry, I guess I got it confused with Rochester. They sound similar. Sorry, didn't mean to offend anyone.--EthanSoll 00:40, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Total power output

Is it really only 20 kW output? It's been running for two years, but the only numbers I can find are "projected" "expected" or "forecast". How much does it actually produce?

If so, where did the "75 homes" number come from? Is that just because a home uses less energy than the per capita usage times the occupants? (Cars, industry, etc.) — Omegatron 03:17, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

photographs

Is there any good reason for having all very similat images in this article? I can't think of one.--J3Mrs (talk) 17:18, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on CIS Tower. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120705145949/http://manchestermodernistsociety.org/icon.html to http://www.manchestermodernistsociety.org/icon.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:23, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on CIS Tower. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:11, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]