Talk:Burning at Both Ends

Burning at Both Ends has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: April 23, 2020. (Reviewed version).

Albums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Punk music (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Punk music, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Punk musicWikipedia:WikiProject Punk musicTemplate:WikiProject Punk musicPunk music articles

Rock music Low‑importance

	Rock music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rock music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rock music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Rock musicWikipedia:WikiProject Rock musicTemplate:WikiProject Rock musicRock music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Guild of Copy Editors

This article was copy edited by Twofingered Typist, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on February 8, 2020.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles

Untitled

Reviews: Review section clearly biased in favour of positive scores. Case in point: the AbsolutePunk review links to a review by a registered user, even though a staff-member of the site crafted a much harsher review of the album. 64.118.23.169 (talk) 03:17, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

^Incorrect. The user is an official AbsolutePunk reviews contributor.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.109.51.177 (talk) 05:00, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Burning at Both Ends/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: MarioSoulTruthFan (talk · contribs) 21:01, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox

Needs alt

Lead

of the month due to bad weather → of the month due to bad weather to finish the album
Add the Dead Press! year end list addition

Background and recording

McTernan, who also acted as the engineer, was assisted Paul Leavitt → missing "by" and the latter worked as an enginner or in production?
Tracking → Recording
following on January 8. → followed on January 8
assisted by Kyle Black → same issue as before
Try to have the sources at the end of the sentences it breaks the reading
tracking → recording

Composition

with the exception of "Calaveras", which is credited to the band. → on the track list says it is to Mikey Ambrose the writting
Like a Virgin Saved by the Bell and The Goonies → years of release
"Calaveras" is written by drummer Mikey Ambrose → add it to the first point I make and remove it from the last setence

Release

The sources that are mid-sentece try to move them to the end of a sentence
before being released on June 28 through Epitaph Records → source?
bonus track[26] → move the source to the end of the sentence
Between June and August, → Between June and August of 2011,

Reception

number 27 on Independent Albums,[50] → move the source to the end of the sentece
AllMusic → second paragraph
Rock Sound → first paragraph
Dead Press! → should be in the first paragraph but the review is quite negative, despite the eight starts, you can choose other instance of the review that is more positive and them move it.

Track listing

Fine

Personnel

Fine

Charts

Fine

References

AllMusic source is dead
Noisecreep → publisher
WP:ALBUMAVOID "An artist's social networking site, such as Facebook or Twitter, in addition to personal blogs and forum posts, should largely be avoided. If the information being added from one of these websites is truly notable enough for inclusion, a publication will likely report about".