Jump to content

Talk:Bréguet 1150 Atlantic

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Re Grammar changes

[edit]

There are two names for that plane. "Atlantic" is the original version, build in the 1960s, while "Atlantique" is the later french only version. So german planes should be referred to as "Atlantic". Also I wrote "the very same P-3s", not "the very same P-3" because these planes are the same aircraft. In 2004, the netherlands government suddenly decided to totally phase out anti-submarine patrol aircraft. Maritime patrolling was to be undertaken by unarmed aircraft only. The Netherlands had allready ordered and paid for an upgrade of these aircraft in the US. So the 8 of the 11 Orions plus the upgrade were sold to Germany at a very cheap price. These are the very same airframes the netherlands bought to replace their Atlantics in the early 1980s. The Netherlands retain three Orions without ASW equipment for patrol duties in the Carribean. --JCRitter 13:17, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Only France use the Atlantique 2?

[edit]

The articles writes:"The Atlantique 2 is an updated version produced for the French Navy in the 1980s."Well, only Frances uses the Atlantique 2 or italso used by Italy and Germany?Agre22 (talk) 01:25, 30 March 2009 (UTC)agre22[reply]

Only France uses the Altantique 2. Italy and Germany only had the first versions of the Atlantic. - BillCJ (talk) 01:40, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Civil version

[edit]

Is there a civil version of this aircraft? It looks somewhat like a BAe 748. -- Gyrofrog (talk) 14:46, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The 748 was wholly British and so was completely unrelated, however the Atlantique was related to a proposed civil transport that, although it went nowhere, was an early step in the process that eventually led to the Airbus (or so I recall reading - perhaps in Air International?)NiD.29 (talk) 07:18, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
No. A distinct characteristic of the Atlantic is the "double bubble" fuselage. This was on the drawing board from the outset as a sensible way to carry droppable stores: both sonobuoys and depth charges. The lack of such space was one of the big problems at the time for adapting civilian airframes. Nimrod did something similar, but that involved major (and usually unappreciated) changes to the original Comet fuselage. To go back to a civilian aircraft, this fuselage shape would be pointless. An original Atlantic would be a narrow and over-complex passenger fuselage with wasted space beneath, a modified Atlantic would be a major redesign cost. So a civilian Atlantic isn't really credible. Andy Dingley (talk) 13:17, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

(I wont start a new section just for this.) The "torpedos" appear to be storepedos.203.220.80.187 (talk) 02:19, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Page name

[edit]
Everything I have read suggests that Atlantique and Atlantic are nothing more than the same name in different languages, and indeed the Atlantique name seems far more prevalent even in English than Atlantic even for examples of the first version. Do you have any references that explicitly support this claim regarding the naming?NiD.29 (talk) 06:56, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request its removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

  • http://www.naval-technology.com/projects/atlantique/index.html
    Triggered by \bnaval-technology\.com\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 09:24, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Resolved This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag, if not already done. No further action is necessary.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 20:20, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Breguet Atlantic. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:15, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]