Talk:Botrychium

This needs a complete revision

Is the separation of the grapeferns tenable? I think the latest word is "certainly not"... in any case species need to be reviewed and Botrypus is one hell of a mess. Dysmorodrepanis 00:55, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think the consensus at the Plant project is that it is at least reasonable to have a page for every genus level, though not necessarily for every species levels. I'm doing an undergraduate research project on Botrychiums this year so I'll try to get some more sources added when I come across their journal articles. Ataylor18 (talk) 01:30, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm concerned that the Botrychium lunarioides picture is not actually a B. lunarioides. The trophophore looks nothing like I've seen before and the sporophore seems too upright and diminished. The pinnae should be more rounded on the apex and spread out. It usually sits flush with the ground, not slightly above as in this picture. There is normally alot more sporangia. To me, it just looks more like a B. virginianum than a B. lunarioides but I'm not saying it's that, either. Maybe someone can give a third opinion, here. :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ataylor18 (talk • contribs) 16:39, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

FWIW, my take is that it looks like B. virginianum, too. The apices of the divisions of the trophophore seem much too acute to be a B. lunarioides. Choess (talk) 00:51, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the thumbnail.Ataylor18 (talk) 06:20, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Botrychium. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120426072518/http://www1.dnr.wa.gov/nhp/refdesk/fguide/pdf/botlin.pdf to http://www1.dnr.wa.gov/nhp/refdesk/fguide/pdf/botlin.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:22, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Botrychium. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:27, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]