Talk:Bookmark (digital)

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Mid-importance).

Internet Mid‑importance

	Internet portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Notes for article development

violawww, cello, and gopher browsers had bookmarks before mosaic.
Pre-internet bookmarks
- in-document bookmarks in crisp and other editors, see google groups search

--Lexein 08:15, 18 April 2007 (UTC) (fixed --Lexein)[reply]

Here are some other definition:

The process of saving a Web URL in your Web browser. Allows the user to return to a particular site or entry by making a record of it.

A method of storing links to individual web pages or web locations on your computer. Bookmark is the term used by Netscape; Favorites is the Internet Explorer term.

A record kept by web browers of selected web sites. The user can return directly to a particular site by accessing their bookmark file.

A routine that allows you to save a reference to a site or page that you have already visited. At a later point in time, you can use a bookmark to return to that page. It commonly refers to a feature of Netscape Navigator (a web browser) that allows you to collect and organize bookmarks of your favorite web sites.

Using a World Wide Web browser, a bookmark is a saved link to a Web page that has been added to a list of saved links. When you are looking at a particular Web site or home page and want to be able to quickly get back to it later, you can create a bookmark for it. You can think of your browser as a book full of (millions of ) Web pages and a few well-placed bookmarks that you have chosen. The list that contains your bookmarks is the "bookmark list" (and sometimes it is called a "hotlist"). ...

A hyperlink that is saved in the bookmark list, a file in your browser. You can use bookmarks to keep track of favorite or important sites and to return there whenever you are on the World Wide Web.

Creation of a link to a website already visited, so that the user can return to that website directly, without using a search engine or directory.

The feature of a Web Browser that lets you save the address (URL) of a web page so you can go back to the page easily at a later time.

Bookmark are equivalent to Favorites (Internet Explorer aka IE). Bookmarks server the purpose of stamping a certain web page that you find intriguing and want to save the website URL address.

The way to save a Web page location that is frequently visited for future reference. You can save a Web page as a bookmark, also known as Favorites. This allows you to choose a link from a drop down menu and avoids the need to retype or memorize the Web page address in order to access it again. --—Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.92.171.203 (talk • contribs) 2007-04-20T14:58:55

Where did these come from? Not too useful if not cited from somewhere. Also, a bookmark is primarily a noun, though it can be used as a verb. The article can certainly be expanded:

Many people don't even use them - bookmark lists grow unwieldy, and are too computer/browser-specific
Sessions: a list of all open windows or tabs, saved as a folder of bookmarks. Bookmark-all-windows feature in Firefox/Netscape, n/a in Opera or IE(?) --Lexein 20:19, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposed

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

The result was merge partially and place a redirect. -- B. Wolterding 11:43, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Since Webmarks seems to duplicate parts of the information here, I am proposing to merge it into htis article. In fact, if you agree, just go ahead. Proposed as part of the Notability wikiproject. --B. Wolterding 11:38, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I oppose merging: there's no new information and no sources cited. I advocate redirecting Webmarks here. --Lexein 18:29, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support webmarks are of a different nature (being "hosted bookmarks"). I suggest a merger - they are not a major term so a single sentence with a "fact" tag would do the job.Ga rr ie 01:51, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I merged half a sentence and placed a redirect, hoping to be in consensus with all voters. --B. Wolterding 09:00, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cool --Lexein 20:50, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Fair use rationale for Image:Favorites.PNG

Image:Favorites.PNG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:44, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

rationale added --Lexein 20:52, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I added the rationale, and some ass deleted the image anyways. That's f'd up. --Lexein 06:48, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

pdf bookmarks

What about pdf bookmarks? They are nowhere mentioned in the article

213.224.164.205 21:47, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you mean the bookmarks inside a pdf file that link to pages within that file, just Google "pdf bookmark". I just did and got a bunch of links to web pages on how to create them.

Hccrle (talk) 09:58, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bookmark Name / Bookmark Title

Where do browsers get the text to list for each bookmark in the bookmark menu? This is the type of basic information we need to include. I know part of the answer: from the <title> element in the <head> section of the HTML file — the same place it gets the text to display in the browser's title bar. If it is a file type other than HTML or XHTML, it uses the file's basename (including the extension).

What I don't know is a) Is this the only place a browser can get the bookmark name? That is, is it possible to specify different text for the bookmark name than for the title bar? (Yes, I know the user can do this, but is there any way the web page can specify a separate bookmark title as the default for that page?) If you're wondering why anyone would want to do this, it's because a title bar fits a lot more text than a bookmark menu entry. b) Is there a standard for specifying a bookmark name in XML files other than XHTML? Bostoner (talk) 00:40, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I can tell from the HTML spec (http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/struct/global.html#h-7.4), there is no other official way of providing a title for bookmarks in an HTML document. It is possible to provide all kinds of descriptive info in META tags, which are not standardized except in profile files that can be referenced from the HEAD tag. Whether any web servers and/or browsers use meta data for that purpose, I do not know. As for XML (http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml/), this does not even have anything like the TITLE element of HTML as far as I can discern. Hccrle (talk) 10:56, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bookmark (World Wide Web). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160304060405/http://www.pcmag.com/print_article2/0,1217,a=116252,00.asp to http://www.pcmag.com/print_article2/0,1217,a=116252,00.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:50, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 15 May 2018

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Page not moved. There was no support for retitling. (closed by non-admin page mover) -- Dane ^talk 05:41, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bookmark (World Wide Web) → Bookmark (Internet) – World Wide Web seems to me quite a dated term. "Internet" is more concise, recognisable and natural. Teratix (talk) 13:11, 15 May 2018 (UTC) --Relisting. Brad v 13:23, 24 May 2018 (UTC) Note: I have changed "internet" to "Internet" since people seem to prefer the upper-case version. Tera TIX 00:54, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support, not only dated but the inventor of the naming procedures, if I recall correctly, is sorry that he added the WWW because of the worldwide-accumulated manhours (I guess it's called "humanhours" or something else now) used every day by people typing the letters. Anyway, good nomination, and surprised it hasn't been changed before. Randy Kryn (talk) 14:44, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - shouldn't "Internet" be capitalized in the suggested title? I mean, we use capitals when talking about it on articles like the "Internet" page... Paintspot Infez (talk) 16:48, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Upper-case per its page and as a proper noun. Randy Kryn (talk) 18:47, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Yes it should be Internet. Andrewa (talk) 03:08, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

prefer Bookmark (computing) since this is a property, not of the Internet, but of the program used to browse it. It also allows a bit of coverage to be added about other contexts (such as Word docs) without necessitating a wholly separate article. -- Netoholic @ 20:33, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Good point, computing seems like a better, broader term. Teratix (talk) 23:44, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bookmark (computing) is where this article started. It was then moved to Internet bookmark, Bookmark (web) and finally to the current title. Station1 (talk) 00:05, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bookmark (web) seems to be the most apt. in this case, probably should've stayed the same. Gotitbro (talk) 02:17, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose – the article seems to be specifically about www bookmarks. Dicklyon (talk) 03:20, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Currently, yes, due to the name. But I believe it can be expanded if we go the (computing) route. -- Netoholic @ 03:22, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

That would be a quite different topic. Why not go ahead and write that article, and then see whether a merge makes sense or not? Dicklyon (talk) 18:42, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. As Dicklyon says, this is putting the cart before the horse. Support the suggestion of writing the new article, and then discussing a merge... but I think the merge will turn out not to be a good idea anyway. This is a perfectly good article on a good if historic topic. Andrewa (talk) 03:08, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Using "internet" is simply wrong. Lower-case "internet" means "an/any internetwork", i.e. a WAN. The Internet is capitalized; there is only one of it, the global network of networks. Many newspapers get this wrong, because they are staffed by journalists not techies. WP knows better. I could get behind "Bookmark (Web)" (the Web is also a proper noun in this sense, whether you give the full World Wide Web name or not) for concision, or "Bookmark (computing)" if the scope is going to expand, which it probably should: at this point, you can use exactly the same applications to bookmark stuff on your hard drive, or a network drive, or whatever, not just websites. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 15:01, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment:Good point about the capitalisation. This is perhaps borderline as to whether it's style or usage, but on balance the "i" should be capitalised. Andrewa (talk) 15:34, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have no problem with upper- or lower-case. Tera TIX 00:51, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Article title

The article’s title doesn’t accurately or completely represent the article’s subject matter. I’m proposing we move it to Bookmark (digital), which is an article title that better represents what’s described here. Thoughts? —LLarson (said & done) 00:12, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done¹ —LLarson (said & done) 14:48, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Cloud based bookmarking

Social bookmarking is not necessarily the same as many of the cloud based bookmarking sites that have sprung up to allow users to share one database of bookmarks with multiple devices (rather than users). I feel we need a section for this topic, especially with the demise of "Google Bookmarks" and del.icio.us. Also need a "list of cloud based bookmarking sites" for sites such as Raindrop.io --Lbecque (talk) 02:57, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]