Talk:Belisama

	Belisama is within the scope of WikiProject Celts, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the ancient Celts and the modern day Celtic nations. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article or you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks or take part in the discussion. Please Join, Create, and Assess.CeltsWikipedia:WikiProject CeltsTemplate:WikiProject CeltsCelts articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Gaul Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Gaul, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Gaul on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GaulWikipedia:WikiProject GaulTemplate:WikiProject GaulGaul articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Name

Belisama (also Belesama, Belisma)

Where is the evidence for these two variant names?

to answer my own question, belesami is in a Gaulish inscription in Greek letters. need to figure out what the nominative is from that .... and also get the actual Greek rather than a transliteration.

I suspect the Delamarre has an etymology, once I get my books unpacked. --Nantonos 21:01, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Long-overdue reply: For the nominative of Bηλησαμι, Jufer and Luginbühl list Bηλησαμη, but surely this wrongly assumes Greek inflectional morphology, rather than Gaulish? Gaulish doesn't have feminines in -η, does it? For the time being, I've emended Jufer and Luginbühl to read Bηλησαμα. Quartier Latin1968

19:13, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Belisma?

The new Italian article – which unfortunately is of poor quality – uses the spelling 'Belisma' and asserts that 'Belisna' and 'Belisana' are also among the goddess's epiteti (sic). On what grounds I have no idea. From what I understand, there are precisely three sources for the name Belisama/Bηλησαμα: the Gaulish inscription, the Latin inscription, and Ptolemy's reference to the place-name (which might be a coincidental resemblance in any case). What are the exact spellings Ptolemy uses? What reason do we have to identify the river in northern England with this southern Gaulish goddess? And while we are about it, what reason does the author of celtnet.org.uk have for asserting Belisama to be in any way connected with Belenus? Q·L·1968 ☿ 10:46, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ribble

Given that this deity is attested one single time, in Gaul, where does the association with a British river come from?

I thought Ronald Hutton gave the Roman name for the Ribble as something similar to Belisama... I can try to find it when I get home. Incidentally, this page could maybe benefit from a translation from fr – there's a bit more material there. Quartier Latin1968

19:01, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The French article has no cited references, and just a general Celtic bibliography. I wonder what Hutton's source is - perhaps a fort dedication, or Ptolemy? --Nantonos 21:01, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that was a definite problem I found with it when translating. A sentence or two after mentioning the Belisama and the Ribble, Hutton gives a footnote for "Webster, The British Celts, pp. 72–73". But I notice that Mary Jones' Celtic Encyclopedia credits Ptolemy with the identification of the Belisama as a river in northern England – either the Ribble or the Mersey, according to interpretation. Quartier Latin1968

21:12, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I tracked it down, it is Ptolemy; added to article. Also mailed Mary Jones for clarification. --Nantonos 23:46, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Inscriptional evidence

A Slovenian? article (which I don't read) put me onto the Gaulish inscription; I wondered why it did not show up in the Latin inscription databases! I also added the more well known Latin inscription from Aquitania. --Nantonos 21:01, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

References

Quartier, I had to convert your ref markup to the format that I am more used to from the manual of style, to get the other references in order. Sorry to mess with our footnote-style references. --Nantonos 21:01, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No problem at all! Thanks for giving this article so much attention – it's shaping up to something respectable-looking now. ;-) Quartier Latin1968

21:05, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Woops, sorry Nantonos, I forgot about this exchange, so I've effectively reverted to the new reference format, then. (I don't care for in-line citations anyhow, and the <ref> </ref> format is supposed to be the preferred style now, I think. Sorry; it's not a hostile revert! Quartier Latin1968

19:18, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Lunate sigma

In the caption to the inscription, I can't find a way to force fonts with a capital lunate sigma — neither {{unicode}} nor {{polytonic}} seems to do it for me. And since this is a not-very-widely supported character, I've replaced it for now with the equivalent character (С) in Cyrillic instead. The latter should show up fine for most people these days. Not an ideal solution, but it should do. (For me, at least, the capital omega appears fine; is that a Cyrillic capital omega?) Quartier Latin1968 16:11, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ba'al Shamin

In mentioned connection to Ba'al Shamin seems implausible as Ba'al Shamin was a Hellenistic era syncretic Palmyran deity, who wouldn't have evolved until after the Assyrians conquered Canaan, and Carthage became the center of Phoenician civilization. Moreover Ba'al Shamin had no common traits with Belisama. If the goddess Belisama is derived from a Phonetician deity, then it would seem to be a Phoenician/Canaanite goddess, with similar traits, such as 'Anat. If the name is the only reason to look to Phoenicia for a ancestor, then it's more likely she's named after Ba'al Sumur (the Lord of the trading port of Sumur) although there is no evidence of this. I recommend the Ba'al Shamin reference be removed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.151.162.229 (talk) 04:30, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I thought it was nonsense too. I'm commenting it out for now. If nobody can produce a credible source, then let's delete it altogether. Q·L·1968 ☿ 10:49, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:RIG G-172.jpg

The image Image:RIG G-172.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --02:52, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Language

Βηλησαμα is not the Greek-language name for Belisama. Belisama is, in fact, not known in any Greek writing. Βηλησαμα is Gaulish. Only the alphabet is Greek. I'll be adjusting the text accordingly. Q·L·1968 ☿ 22:39, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Goddess "of" stuff

Nothing is known about the goddess except from her association with Minerva, and that only epigraphically.

People are free to speculate on either that or on etymologizing her name. Doing so, you easily end up with her being the goddess "of" wisdom, healing, the (hearth) fire, etc., but this is all modern speculation and needs to be cited by giving an author and a year. Editing Wikipedia, you are not free to just speculate in Wikipedia's voice. This includes the introduction of categories like "Goddess of Fire" and the like. Also, Ptolemy's river name is certainly worth noting, but strictly speaking this doesn't establish a presence of the goddess in Britain. These names are epithets, and if this name simply means "brightest" or "strongest", it may as well have emerged as a river name independently. The "same" goddess that was given the name of "Belisama" in Gaul may, for example, have been known as Sulis, or Coventina, or any number of other names, without the epithet Belisama ever catching on. We don't know. --dab (𒁳) 06:33, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Belisama. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080321112659/http://www.celtnet.org.uk:80/gods_b/belisama.html to http://www.celtnet.org.uk/gods_b/belisama.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:04, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good! Q·L·1968 ☿ 04:42, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]