Talk:Belgrade Theatre

Belgrade Theatre was nominated as a Art and architecture good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (May 5, 2021). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.

Theatre Low‑importance

	Theatre portal This article is part of WikiProject Theatre, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of theatre on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.TheatreWikipedia:WikiProject TheatreTemplate:WikiProject TheatreTheatre articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Architecture

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Coventry (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Coventry, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.CoventryWikipedia:WikiProject CoventryTemplate:WikiProject CoventryCoventry articles

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Belgrade Theatre/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Alan Islas (talk · contribs) 15:18, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Ballpointbiro, I'll be taking on this review. More to be added as I work through the article, but see initial comments below:

The lead section needs to be expanded to include the main topics of the article with the appropriate weight. This essay might be useful as a guide: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:How_to_create_and_manage_a_good_lead_section#Content_and_structure
I don't think it is necessary to include full list of staff members. Perhaps some of the names could be included in the Management section, as part of the text instead of a list format.
Add Authority control template
Perhaps one or more images could be added that show a closer view of the building. There are some available in Commons.
The subsection "Events in collaboration with Coventry UK City of Culture" might be redundant.

--Alan Islas (talk) 15:18, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

More:

The first paragraph of the "Design and Construction" section relies heavily on the Gould reference. Found a couple of sources from Dr Alistair Fair that might be useful, an online article: https://c20society.org.uk/building-of-the-month/belgrade-theatre-coventry and a journal article: https://www.jstor.org/stable/41418357?seq=1 (as you probably know, JSTOR can be accessed with the Wikipedia library card platform).

An image of the extension of the theatre would be useful to add. Found this one in Commons, but perhaps there are more:

More information and archive links could be added to some of the sources. For example, reference 15 about theatre in education does have a named author.

Paraphrasing might be too close to the text of reference 15 (about the Pow Wow project).

Alan Islas (talk) 13:10, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It has been two weeks without any response. Failing. Alan Islas (talk) 22:57, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]