This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Historic sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of historic sites on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Historic sitesWikipedia:WikiProject Historic sitesTemplate:WikiProject Historic sitesHistoric sites articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
A fact from Beaux-Arts Apartments appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 18 August 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Did you know... that the Beaux-Arts Apartments never went into foreclosure despite being completed at the start of the Great Depression?
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Overall: Article is new enough, long enough and sourced. All 3 hooks are cited and interesting. No apparent copyvio, Earwig only picked up names and addresses. The only change I would suggest might be adding a picture to this nomination, since I see a couple on the article. Once qpq is done this one will be ready. qpq has been done. BuySomeApples (talk) 05:01, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@BuySomeApples: Thanks for the review. I've done a QPQ and added an image for consideration now. The reason I was hesitant to add the images before (even though almost all of them are my own photos) was because none of them really showed the full extent of either building, or even a significant portion of the building. Epicgenius (talk) 19:23, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Epicgenius: Awesome this nomination is ready then! The picture isn't really necessary if you don't feel that any of them adequately depict the building. Although it's nice to have, I think I'll defer to your preference on it. At this point, we can leave it in or out. BuySomeApples (talk) 20:54, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
BuySomeApples, it is fine either way. I suppose the promoter will decide whether to include the photo when they do move this to a prep, so I'm not too worried about the image being used (or not). Epicgenius (talk) 23:25, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Article is new enough, long enough and sourced. All 3 hooks are cited and interesting. No apparent copyvio, Earwig only picked up names and addresses. The only change I would suggest might be adding a picture to this nomination, since I see a couple on the article.