Template:Did you know nominations/Beaux-Arts Apartments

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:46, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

Beaux-Arts Apartments

(

• Back to T:TDYK
• Article history

)

One of the Beaux-Arts Apartments

• ... that the Beaux-Arts Apartments were described in The New York Times as a "pair of monuments to Art Deco"? Source: ray, Christopher (November 2, 1997). "Streetscapes/The Beaux-Arts Apartments, 307 and 310 East 44th Street; A Matched Pair of 1930 Monuments to Art Deco". The New York Times
  • ALT1:... that the Beaux-Arts Apartments never went into foreclosure despite being completed at the start of the Great Depression? Source: ray, Christopher (November 2, 1997). "Streetscapes/The Beaux-Arts Apartments, 307 and 310 East 44th Street; A Matched Pair of 1930 Monuments to Art Deco". The New York Times
  • ALT2:... that the terraced upper stories of the Beaux-Arts Apartments were once compared to a jigsaw puzzle? Source: Baldwin, Deborah (November 14, 2008). "Artists in Residence". The New York Times

• Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Alexander Gordon (brewer)

Created by Epicgenius (talk). Self-nominated at 17:46, 6 August 2021 (UTC).

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
Freely licensed: Used in article: Clear at 100px:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: Article is new enough, long enough and sourced. All 3 hooks are cited and interesting. No apparent copyvio, Earwig only picked up names and addresses. The only change I would suggest might be adding a picture to this nomination, since I see a couple on the article. Once qpq is done this one will be ready. qpq has been done. BuySomeApples (talk) 05:01, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

@BuySomeApples: Thanks for the review. I've done a QPQ and added an image for consideration now. The reason I was hesitant to add the images before (even though almost all of them are my own photos) was because none of them really showed the full extent of either building, or even a significant portion of the building. Epicgenius (talk) 19:23, 10 August 2021 (UTC)

@Epicgenius: Awesome this nomination is ready then! The picture isn't really necessary if you don't feel that any of them adequately depict the building. Although it's nice to have, I think I'll defer to your preference on it. At this point, we can leave it in or out. BuySomeApples (talk) 20:54, 10 August 2021 (UTC)

Hi @Epicgenius: I wasn't sure if you preferred the photo or not. If not, I can just leave it out. BuySomeApples (talk) 23:17, 12 August 2021 (UTC)

BuySomeApples, it is fine either way. I suppose the promoter will decide whether to include the photo when they do move this to a prep, so I'm not too worried about the image being used (or not). Epicgenius (talk) 23:25, 12 August 2021 (UTC)

@Epicgenius: In that case I'm gonna approve the photos with this nomination and leave it up to the promoter. Thanks! BuySomeApples (talk) 23:28, 12 August 2021 (UTC)