This article is within the scope of the Discographies WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's collection of discography articles and lists. If you would like to participate please visit the project page. Any questions pertaining to discography-related articles should be directed to the project's talk page.DiscographiesWikipedia:WikiProject DiscographiesTemplate:WikiProject DiscographiesDiscography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hip hop, a collaborative effort to build a useful resource for and improve the coverage of hip hop on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Hip hopWikipedia:WikiProject Hip hopTemplate:WikiProject Hip hopHip hop articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Record Production; a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's documentation of Record Production articles. Questions or comments related to record production and related articles are welcome at the project's talk page. Anyone interested may join the project: add your name to the list of project members!Record ProductionWikipedia:WikiProject Record ProductionTemplate:WikiProject Record ProductionRecord Production articles
Ok, I'd explain some things before we ran into a 3RR. If I take every track Battlecat has ever produced and edit them into a list I'll get exactly THE SAME one as can be found here (and on that blog). I tried and posted other references (four from allmusic, every entry for all name variations of his) to supply the article with reliable sources. If you can figure out other way to have a comlete discography here (that is the main purpose...of Wikipedia let's say), rather than a partial one, then let me know. Otherwise please do not revert it. Furthermore I really doub that lists can be copyrighted at all following the reasoning above. For example if I collect the capital cities in the world in alphabetical order, than I can automaticly aquire a license on it? Or maybe ask the International Copyright Office for one?. I think not.LajbiHolla @ me16:21, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I appreciate you take this to the talk page, but I still think this is a copy vio. If you believe it's not, you're welcome to request another opinion in the proper place. If it turns not to be a copy vio I'm willing to leave the content.Tasc0It's a zero!23:01, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]