Talk:Battle of Chach

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Battle of Chach article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Military history: Asian / South Asia / Medieval C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Asian military history task force
	South Asian military history task force
	Medieval warfare task force (c. 500 – c. 1500)

India Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was submitted or expanded as part of the 2015 Wikipedia Asian Month.

Making a point etc.

A huge allied army, composed of the Hindu Shahis and allied Rajas [..] is meaningless phrasing.

Trilochanapala failed to prevent Mahmud's troops from crossing across the Indus, who then set out for the plains of [..]

Who refers to - Trilochanapala or Mahmud's troops? A reader has to pause for at-least a mini-second to assess whatever the line is trying to convey.

I can go on .... TrangaBellam (talk) 10:06, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No, it's quite clear, and the second sentence clearly implies that this is about Mahmud. पाटलिपुत्र Pat (talk) 10:10, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

And what is this obsession with adjectives? "Relentless", "ultimately" etc.? TrangaBellam (talk) 10:11, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]