Talk:Bati (woreda)
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | On 29 December 2021, it was proposed that this article be moved from Baati (woreda) to Bati (woreda). The result of the discussion was moved. |
|
|
Requested move 29 December 2021
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Lennart97 (talk) 12:38, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Baati (woreda) → Bati (woreda) – Bati is the english name Ue3lman (talk) 21:10, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
- No evidence provided. — BarrelProof (talk) 23:43, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
- This is a contested technical request (permalink). Vaticidalprophet 12:41, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
Pinging Ue3lman and BarrelProof. Vaticidalprophet 12:41, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
- @BarrelProof: The CSA (an Ethiopian government agency) spells it Bati and not Baati. Looking at the page history User:Rastakwere (a now blocked account) changed the name to Baati with an edit summary of "name Baati in local Oromo language". The article used to be named Bati (woreda) but Rastakwere instead copyied and pasted the content of the article from Bati (woreda) to Baati (woreda) without ever using the move page function (that's why you can't see the page history below August) Ue3lman (talk) 19:02, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
- It sounds like a histmerge will be needed instead of an RM, or in addition to it. I have tagged this article for a histmerge. Since this is a request to revert an undiscussed move, it should probably be "speedy" granted as a procedural matter. — BarrelProof (talk) 19:13, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
- The histmerge has been completed. Support speedy move as a revert of an undiscussed move by a since-blocked account (and don't forget the Talk page archive). — BarrelProof (talk) 02:50, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
- It sounds like a histmerge will be needed instead of an RM, or in addition to it. I have tagged this article for a histmerge. Since this is a request to revert an undiscussed move, it should probably be "speedy" granted as a procedural matter. — BarrelProof (talk) 19:13, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.