Talk:Bandstand

Architecture Mid‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Event Venues (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Event Venues, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Event VenuesWikipedia:WikiProject Event VenuesTemplate:WikiProject Event VenuesEvent Venues articles

Shouldn't credit be given???

Come on. Word for word from https://www.amazines.com/Bandstand_related.html Not even paraphrasing? I can see that but no credit??? Sheesh...

Another website... http://www.answers.com/topic/bandstand making me wonder, are they copying this page has this info been ripped...

Reverted merge of Gazebo with this page.

I have initiated a discussion at Talk:Gazebo#Reverted merge with Bandstand if anyone would like to participate in that discussion. I am removing the pasted full text of the Gazebo article, and its references, as they do not pertain to Bandstand, but to Gazebo. This article needs its own citations. duff 06:56, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've reverted the merge with Gazebo (was this a second merge?). There seems to be little support for it, just one editor, and I'd also raise the procedural issue that this merge hadn't been tagged at gazebo (I watched gazebo, but not bandstand). Andy Dingley (talk) 11:12, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that was bpart of my initial concern, as I too watch gazebo. I just reverted back to 2 articles, again. Is that 3 now?

Piano, I don't get your big hurry on this merge. I also didn't see any comments so far besides yours. How about pitching this merge idea at the interested wikiprojects, from both talk pages, and maybe we can get a few more editors to help with article development too.duff 17:17, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reverse merge

"Gazebo" has 9m google hits while 1.5m google hits for "band-stand" OR bandstand. So merging bandstand article into gazebo makes sense than earlier attempt. Also the merge tag placed stayed for months, so we can go ahead. Piano no who (talk) 10:26, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DO NOT MERGE. You're the only editor calling for it, there is no consensus. If the merge discussion tag stayed there that long and you've attracted no further support, then there's clearly no consensus for doing it. Andy Dingley (talk) 12:01, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bandstand. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060621023705/http://scottishironwork.org/datacat.asp?type=ba to http://www.scottishironwork.org/datacat.asp?type=ba

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:38, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Bandstand. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:22, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]