Jump to content

Talk:Bacchus and Ariadne

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 3 September 2020 and 10 December 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Michpec. Peer reviewers: Jayanbuedu, Gleb may.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 15:11, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Other art works

[edit]

Bacchus and Ariadne are the subject of many works of art apart from the celebrated Titian. The story is featured on a Roman cameo plaque kept in the Louvre, in various post-Titian paintings and notably in a painting by the Nabis, Maurice Denis, in the Hermitage, and in a non-figurative oil by Frank Auerbach. Might it not be desirable to append a list of these other "Bacchus and Ariadnes" to the article? In my view it would certainly be helpful to students of the history of art. I invite knowledgeable editors to contribute. Everybody got to be somewhere! (talk) 23:53, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Two examples for consideration Everybody got to be somewhere! (talk) 00:00, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Alessandro Turchi 001
Caesar van Everdingen - Bachus en Ariadne 1660

Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that File:Titian Bacchus and Ariadne.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on September 4, 2015. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2015-09-04. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. Thanks! — Chris Woodrich (talk) 23:56, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bacchus and Ariadne
Bacchus and Ariadne is an oil painting on canvas completed by Titian between 1522 and 1523. One of a cycle of paintings on mythological subjects produced for Alfonso d'Este, the Duke of Ferrara, it depicts the god Bacchus falling in love with Ariadne after she has been deserted by her lover Theseus. Behind Bacchus is a procession of revelers in a chariot drawn by two cheetahs. The painting now hangs in the National Gallery in London.Painting: Titian

Description: Correction/edit needed

[edit]

I don't know what the Wiki writer intended, but there is an error here:

"Ovid lets Bacchus to throw the crown of Ariadne into the sky"

The extraneous word "to" could simply be deleted BUT the statement "Ovid lets Bacchus..." is not logical regarding a writer and his subject: why would he "let" Bacchus?

Ed8r (talk) 15:28, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bacchus and Ariadne. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:41, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Bacchus and Ariadne. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:56, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Restoration

[edit]

The 'Restoration' section is entirely uncited, which is particularly awkward because it makes claims that it says are 'controversial'. I am no art expert, and would not know how to check the content; I propose to remove it, if no citations appear within (say) the next couple of weeks. MrDemeanour (talk) 12:03, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Lucas, A., Plesters, J. 'Titian's "Bacchus and Ariadne"'. National Gallery Technical Bulletin Vol 2, pp 25–47., http://www.nationalgallery.org.uk/technical-bulletin/lucas_plesters1978 was already referenced. It has a very lengthy account, confirming there was controversy in the '60s, which is pretty well known. I have adjusted the text somewhat on the basis of a quick skim of this, & will try to return to it some time. Johnbod (talk) 17:54, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
It may have been referenced; but, absent inline citations, the reader would be compelled to read ALL referenced material to determine the verifiability of any given claim in the article. Please cite inline :-) MrDemeanour (talk) 14:05, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
It wasn't cited before for that section, but is now. Johnbod (talk) 14:09, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Venetian Renaissance Art

[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 5 September 2023 and 12 December 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Spod010 (article contribs). Peer reviewers: DFox03, Hryck, B.elizabeth.ah352.

— Assignment last updated by MayaHBu (talk) 21:12, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello! This is to let editors know that File:Titian Bacchus and Ariadne.jpg, a featured picture used in this article, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for May 10, 2024. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2024-05-10. For the greater benefit of readers, any potential improvements or maintenance that could benefit the quality of this article should be done before its scheduled appearance on the Main Page. This is a rare re-run of a POTD, to celebrate the National Gallery's bicentenary. If you have any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you! Ham II (talk) 18:20, 9 April 2024 (UTC) [reply]

Rokeby Venus

The Rokeby Venus is a painting by Diego Velázquez which was completed between 1647 and 1651. It depicts the Roman goddess Venus in a sensual pose, lying on a bed and looking into a mirror held by her son Cupid. The painting is the only surviving female nude by Velázquez. Since 1906 it has been in the National Gallery in London.

Painting: Diego Velázquez

Recently featured:

Ham II (talk) 18:20, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Update: no longer scheduled for this date, as the article text isn't well-enough cited for the chosen blurb.  — Amakuru (talk) 10:36, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Let me know if I can help with citations. Johnbod (talk) 23:39, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]