Jump to content

Talk:Babel Proclamation

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by DanCherek (talk14:25, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

5x expanded by Eddie891 (talk). Self-nominated at 22:26, 3 March 2021 (UTC).[reply]

  • Newness requirement satisfied by > 5x expansion from 400 characters to 4,000 characters. Article is long enough and appears policy compliant. Earwig detects no issues. Hooks are short enough, interesting, and supported by in-line citations. Subscription required for access to Iowa Heritage Illustrated but accuracy is assumed in good faith from established user/administrator. QPQ still needed. Cbl62 (talk) 18:07, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Babel Proclamation/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Tkbrett (talk · contribs) 19:49, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


After writing a couple of articles about anti-German sentiment, I'm excited to give this one a go. I'll do a review by Monday at the latest. Tkbrett (✉) 19:49, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

Lead

[edit]
  • The proclamation was controversial: expand on this; the body mentions that the proclamation was popular among English speakers and unpopular among everyone else.
  • Image is definitely PD.

Rise in anti-German sentiment

[edit]
  • Good.

Description

[edit]
  • Theodore Roosevelt needs to be introduced as "Former US President", or something along those lines.
  • After World War I ended, the proclamation was repealed...: who repealed it? Harding?

Legacy

[edit]
  • An op-ed published in The Des Moines Register...: when?
  • A hearing in the United States House of Representatives...: when?

References

[edit]
  • Checking against all of the sources, the article is well sourced.
  • Copyvio score of 9.9% (violation unlikely).

Final comments and verdict

[edit]

 On hold: Eddie891, a nice little article which only needs a few tweaks. I made some copy edits and slight rewordings as well. Tkbrett (✉) 00:54, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Tkbrett, I've attempted to institute your comments essentially directly. Let me know what you think. Eddie891 Talk Work 01:24, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Pass: all looks and reads good to me. Congrats on another! Tkbrett (✉) 01:57, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]