Talk:Athabasca Glacier

Glaciers High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Glaciers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Glaciers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GlaciersWikipedia:WikiProject GlaciersTemplate:WikiProject GlaciersGlacier articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Canada: Alberta / Geography Mid‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Alberta.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Geography of Canada.

did not edit anything on athabasca glacier page, want to nick pick it's math, hoping somebody else corrects it. if the athabasca glacier advances several centimeters per day that would be 7.3 meters per year, so, how can it retreat 5 meters per year ? the math 7.3 minus 5 implies that it advances 2.3 meters per year. Stevehartwell (talk) 21:32, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Strictly speaking no part of a glacier ever retreats. Each ice crystal only flows down the slope until it finally melts (in this case it might flow down some centimeters per day). However, the glacier front can be said to "retreat". That is, if the glacier flows down 7 metres a year, and the lowest 12 metres melt, then the glacier front "retreats" 5 metres per year.

Unfortunately the statement you referred to in 2016, was removed soon after you posted. Fomalhaut76 (talk) 08:27, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Athabasca Glacier. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:23, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Missing information

This article barely mentions the glacier itself - why it's significant, its geological history and other natural and social history, how it relates to other glaciers in the region, etc. It seems to be written from the perspective of a tourist guide. The fact that there's a Starbucks there or that tourists and workers have been killed in bus accidents in the parking lot are completely extraneous, however tragic, to the significance of the topic. It's kind of embarrassing to look this up because one wants to learn more about the glaciers of the Canadian Rockies only to find out that the author thought the existence of a Starbucks is more important than the actual reasons why this glacier is notable! Thanks. Bruxism (talk) 03:30, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]