User talk:Stevehartwell

Before any more exchanges on Jimbo's page read this about reliable sources, this about why blogs are very rarely used as a source. I suggest you also read this about those trying to hold your opinions back and also the articles about the scientific method and what constitutes consensus on Wikipedia and in science. You must also bare in mind that all of those pages were formed with consensus, so they may not reflect your view of what consensus is. Remember that nothing is proven, just not dis-proven. If you are in a minority then is does not suggest you are wrong, just that you have not produced enough evidence to show that the majority are wrong, and in this case the majority are not wrong. And if you want to know about Rick Rude then just listen to my dulcet tones talking about him. Darrenhusted (talk) 11:59, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

June 2018

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 20:11, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

June 2023

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on others again, as you did at User talk:Magnolia677, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Bbb23 (talk) 15:47, 17 June 2023 (UTC)