Talk:Association of Firearm and Tool Mark Examiners

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Association of Firearm and Tool Mark Examiners article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Organizations Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Firearms Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Firearms, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of firearms on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FirearmsWikipedia:WikiProject FirearmsTemplate:WikiProject FirearmsFirearms articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law Enforcement Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Law Enforcement. Please Join, Create, and Assess.Law EnforcementWikipedia:WikiProject Law EnforcementTemplate:WikiProject Law EnforcementLaw enforcement articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Technology

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles

Science Low‑importance

	Science portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject ScienceTemplate:WikiProject Sciencescience articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Crime and Criminal Biography Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Copy editing

I've done the best job that I can.Rockyabq 06:07, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Citations, References

I'll add these when I have access to the old Journals. (They're in storage.)Rockyabq 06:07, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Restructuring

I'm not sure what specific restructuring is necessary or desirable. Is there a Wikipedia entry of a similar forensic science professional organization that I could use as an example? Rockyabq 05:46, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Response to inclusion in the Law Enforcement project

It's certainly true that most crime laboratories worldwide are government (law enforcement) entities. But there are many, many independent forensic examiners (not only in the field of firearm and tool marks but in all other forensic science branches). By including the forensic sciences (and their associations) in the Law Enforcement project, the implication is that they are biased in favor of the prosecution. Science (including forensic science) embodies a search for the truth, whether to offer evidence as to the guilt of an individual or to uncover evidence that exonerates him. Rockyabq 03:35, 23 May 2007 (UTC)Rocky (rockyabq)[reply]

The Law Enforcement Wikiproject has no official affiliation with any law enforcement agencies, the inclusion of this article in the law enforcement project is a wikipedia organisational matter more than anything. You can leave a message on the main project talk page, or see our scope page to check whether the article truly fits into our project, but on the basis of implying that forensic associations have a relationship with law enforcement.... well.... they do don't they? Inclusion in a wikiproject doesn't mean that the topic is biased towards the subject of that wikiproject, it just means that the subject is related to the topic :) hope that helps. SGGH ^speak! 10:47, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You are however correct in saying that this article doesn't belong in the project, so I have removed the tag having looked at our scope to be sure. However my above comments still apply, as I feel you wanted the article to be delisted as a result of a misconception on the meeting of its inclusion in the first place :) SGGH ^speak! 11:21, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, SGGH (I suppose :o) Rockyabq 05:43, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Response to Proposed Deletion:

Wikipedia states, "...there is no practical limit to the number of topics we can cover, or the total amount of content..."

I'm unsure why the number of hits an article receives is such an important deciding factor. I can't imagine that many of the articles listed at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Scientific_societies get significantly more hits than this one. The Abkhazian Regional Academy of Sciences? (I'd try to have the AFTE article linked on that page also, but I don't know how. It should be listed there.)

AFTE is the ONLY dedicated professional organization for firearm/toolmark examiners (forensic ballistics) worldwide. If an attorney is checking the credentials of a claimed expert in the field who lists membership in AFTE, shouldn't Wikipedia be able to provide him with assistance? If a new graduate of forensic science is seeking information about a professional organization of firearm/toolmark examiners, shouldn't Wikipedia be able to help him?

Wikipedia's Deletion policy lists:

Reasons for deletion include, but are not limited to, the following:

Advertising or other spam without relevant content (but not an article about an advertising related subject)
Content not suitable for an encyclopedia
Copyright infringement
Hoax articles (but not articles describing a notable hoax)
Images that are unused, obsolete, violate fair-use policy, or are unencyclopedic
Inappropriate user pages
Inflammatory redirects
Article information that cannot possibly be attributed to reliable sources
All attempts to find reliable sources to which article information can be verified have failed
Newly-coined neologisms
Overcategorization
Patent nonsense or gibberish
Redundant templates
Subject fails to meet the relevant notability guideline (WP:BIO, WP:MUSIC, WP:CORP and so forth)
Vandalism that is not correctible

Of these, "Content not suitable for an encyclopedia" might be stretched to apply, but then it would apply to all the articles listed at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Scientific_societies also, wouldn't it?

Thanks for your consideration, Rockyabq 03:35, 23 May 2007 (UTC)Rocky (rockyabq, original author of this entry)[reply]