Jump to content

Talk:Arleta Library Bakery & Cafe

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleArleta Library Bakery & Cafe has been listed as one of the Agriculture, food and drink good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 19, 2024Good article nomineeNot listed
August 22, 2024Good article nomineeListed
Current status: Good article

Image

[edit]

The closest thing I could find for an image of the building was this. Unfortunately, it's all I've found. TWOrantulaTM (enter the web) 23:52, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I wasn't able to upload the image via Flickypedia, so maybe not licensed appropriately. Hopefully someone will upload a photo of the building's exterior some day. ---Another Believer (Talk) 01:19, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA Fail

[edit]

I'm really sorry about the fail. I think given the amount of rewriting required, it is more appropriate for some time to be taken and then resubmitted. I can already see the work TWOrantula is putting in is improving it a lot. Rollinginhisgrave (talk) 03:12, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I do not appreciate that you left a review, then when a nominator started to address issues, you closed the process and failed the nomination. In my opinion, this is not in the spirit of collaboration. However, you've made your decision. I hope that if TrademarkedTWOrantula and I seek another review, you will let another editor review this time. Thanks ---Another Believer (Talk) 03:17, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yep. Next time, try not to close a nomination as soon as you post your comments. Unless you can find a major issue that Another Believer and I feel that impedes the article from passing, don't quickfail the article right away. TWOrantulaTM (enter the web) 03:26, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm sorry, I wasn't aware quickfail had to be at the exact same time as the review. It took me about ten minutes to confirm it should be quickfailed, as I wanted to read the guidelines before confirming. I'm sorry for missing you were editing the page TWOrantula. I will enter the quickfail at the same time as the review in the future.
TWOrantula; I definitely don't think I need nominator approval to quickfail.
Another Believer; I won't review the Bistro Agnes page. I'll also ask for a review of my conduct on the discussion board, and won't fail anything until it's discussed. I'll also get a few more reviews under my belt before I come back to an article you nominate. Rollinginhisgrave (talk) 03:49, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks ---Another Believer (Talk) 14:14, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Is the appearance on TV a reflection of notability or what makes it notable?

[edit]

Rollinginhisgrave (talk) 15:08, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In addition to sufficient secondary coverage, the national TV program certainly helps demonstrate notability. ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:12, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]