Jump to content

Talk:Arleta Library Bakery & Cafe/GA2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Another Believer (talk · contribs) 03:31, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: CursedWithTheAbilityToDoTheMath (talk · contribs) 21:21, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reviewing! I have made these changes to the article, which I believe address your concerns. Are you able to take another look and let me know if anything else is required? Thanks again! ---Another Believer (Talk) 21:29, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oops! I added Fieri commentary here. ---Another Believer (Talk) 21:33, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


 Done ---Another Believer (Talk) 21:33, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Looks good! Thanks for getting back to me so quickly! I really enjoyed reviwing this article good work to both you and your co-nominator!CursedWithTheAbilityToDoTheMath (talk) 21:38, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@CursedWithTheAbilityToDoTheMath Thanks! Bistro Agnes is nominated as well, if you're interested. ---Another Believer (Talk) 21:41, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Rate Attribute Review Comment
1. Well-written:
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. "The business was co-owned by Sarah and Nick Iannarone until December 2018, until their divorce in 2019"

I'm not fully sure what you are trying to say here. Is there a way to reword this without using the word until twice?

"Arleta Library Bakery & Cafe operated at the intersection of 72nd Avenue and Harold Street in the Mt. Scott-Arleta neighborhood of southeast Portland and had a narrow interior."

The "and had a narrow interior." part seems a bit out of place in this sentence.

Otherwise the article is easy to understand and well written. CursedWithTheAbilityToDoTheMath (talk) 21:21, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Done

"The menu also included breakfast sandwiches, omelettes, pancakes, coconut macaroons, other baked goods such as chocolate chip cookies, and coffee."

This sentence feels oddly worded, I feel as though you could remove the "other baked goods such as" part to make it flow better. CursedWithTheAbilityToDoTheMath (talk) 21:25, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@CursedWithTheAbilityToDoTheMath:  Done ---Another Believer (Talk) 21:40, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. I feel like it would make sense to add why the restaurant closed in the lede. Otherwise, it complies with the MOS.CursedWithTheAbilityToDoTheMath (talk) 21:21, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Done

2. Verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check:
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. CursedWithTheAbilityToDoTheMath (talk) 21:21, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). I was able to access and verify all of the online sources. The two sources not linked included quotes that backed up the information given. CursedWithTheAbilityToDoTheMath (talk) 21:21, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
2c. it contains no original research. CursedWithTheAbilityToDoTheMath (talk) 21:21, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. Passed copyvio check and all content was put into the writer's own words.CursedWithTheAbilityToDoTheMath (talk) 21:21, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
3. Broad in its coverage:
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. I'm not sure if this would be considered unnecessary detail but it might be worth adding what Guy Fieri thought of the restaurant considering he is a prominent name in the food industry and you included others' opinions on the restaurant. CursedWithTheAbilityToDoTheMath (talk) 21:21, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Done

3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). CursedWithTheAbilityToDoTheMath (talk) 21:21, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. CursedWithTheAbilityToDoTheMath (talk) 21:21, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. CursedWithTheAbilityToDoTheMath (talk) 21:21, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. CursedWithTheAbilityToDoTheMath (talk) 21:21, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. CursedWithTheAbilityToDoTheMath (talk) 21:21, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
7. Overall assessment. On hold until @TrademarkedTWOrantula and Another Believer: can address 1a, 1b, and 3a. Done Other than the 3 very minor issues I found the article was easy to understand, well-written, and appropriately sourced. While the article is on the shorter side it includes all information on the topic. CursedWithTheAbilityToDoTheMath (talk) 21:21, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nominators have improved on the areas I mentioned and I will now be passing this article! CursedWithTheAbilityToDoTheMath (talk) 21:43, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.