Talk:Argumentum a contrario

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Mid

This redirect has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Logic

argumentum a/e contrario

Why is this Latin phrase argumentum e contrario in German and some other languages? --Espoo (talk) 20:04, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"as such"

From the article: § 123 of the X-Law says that green cars need to have blue tires. As such, red cars don't have to have blue tires.

I don't think "as such" is the correct expression here and in the other two cases where "as such" is used. What's intended here, I think, is "thus" or "therefore." Here's the definition of "as such" from Merriam-Webster Online:

— as such: intrinsically considered : (example: in itself as such the gift was worth little)

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/as%20such

Omc (talk) 23:47, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Expressio unius

Is there any difference between this and the maxim of expressio unius est exclusio alterius? They seem to me to cover the same fieldDeonyi (talk) 11:19, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]