Jump to content

Talk:Arbeideren (Hamar)/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: SCB '92 (talk contribs count) 22:13, 18 September 2011 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria[reply]


Not a bad looking article

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    good
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
    good
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    good
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    good
    C. No original research:
    good
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    good
    B. Focused:
    good
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
    good
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
    good
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    good
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
    good
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:
    In the Labour Party Period section, the two images seem to be sandwiching the text between them, and I think the text "First World War" should link to "World War I" instead of redirect, so to look like this "First World War"; other than that, the article looks fine and meets the criteria