Talk:Arbeideren (Hamar)/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: SCB '92 (talk • contribs • count) 22:13, 18 September 2011 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
Not a bad looking article
- Is it reasonably well written?
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- good
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- good
- C. No original research:
- good
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- good
- B. Focused:
- good
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- good
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- good
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- good
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- good
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- In the Labour Party Period section, the two images seem to be sandwiching the text between them, and I think the text "First World War" should link to "World War I" instead of redirect, so to look like this "First World War"; other than that, the article looks fine and meets the criteria
- Pass or Fail: