Talk:Arbeideren (Hamar)

Newspapers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Newspapers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Newspapers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NewspapersWikipedia:WikiProject NewspapersTemplate:WikiProject NewspapersNewspapers articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Socialism Low‑importance

	Socialism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Norway

	Norway portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Norway, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Norway on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NorwayWikipedia:WikiProject NorwayTemplate:WikiProject NorwayNorway articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Guild of Copy Editors

This article was copy edited by Slon02, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on August 19, 2011.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles

Arbeideren (Hamar) has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
September 18, 2011	Good article nominee	Listed

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on September 9, 2010.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that competitors of the Hamar newspaper Demokraten (later Arbeideren) refused to mention it by name in their columns?

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Arbeideren (Hamar)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: SCB '92 (talk • contribs • count) 22:13, 18 September 2011 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria[reply]

Not a bad looking article

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality:
good

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
good
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources:
good

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
good

C. No original research:
good
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:
good

B. Focused:
good
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
good
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
good
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
good

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
good
Overall:
Pass or Fail:
In the Labour Party Period section, the two images seem to be sandwiching the text between them, and I think the text "First World War" should link to "World War I" instead of redirect, so to look like this "First World War"; other than that, the article looks fine and meets the criteria