Talk:Antelope Hill Publishing

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Antelope Hill Publishing article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Organizations Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Conservatism Low‑importance

	Conservatism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Books: Reference works

	Books portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles
	This article is supported by the Reference works task force.

SPLC - Penn State Bull-Moose Party Claims

I just wanted to point out the need for addition citations. The Southern Poverty Law Center makes a lot of claims in their article, but backs up nearly none of them with any evidence. If you're going to echo their claims you should have to provide more evidence than just the one source. For example, the Bull-Moose Party at Penn State, @Llll5032: said it was described as "Alt-Right" using the SPLC citiation, which then goes on to quote a Slate article. The Slate article quotes someone at a Richard B. Spencer event who claims to represent the Club at Penn State, but gives no evidence he's actually involved in any way. The Slate article cites an article by WJAC-TV about the Bull-Moose Party protesting by building a wall on campus, but it doesn't mention James O’Mailia who the Slate Article quotes, nor does it refer to the group as "Alt-Right", or even "Conservative" for that matter.

All of that goes against the official page for the club listed on Penn State's website that is described here as populist conservative. Also taking into account not a single article from the Penn State Daily Collegian refers to the group as "Alt-Right" either. It's irresponsible to spout off these claims without having it irrefutably backed up. Chrisisreed (talk) 14:36, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I think it would be all right to remove the sentence about the Bull-Moose group, which is not necessary for understanding the publisher. Or, we could add a ref to the Slate article that the SPLC cited without risking WP:COAT or WP:SYNTH. But we should limit our own WP:OR and WP:PRIMARY research. (Per WP:SPLC, we can assume the SPLC is reliable unless there is a clear dispute, while attributing WP:INTEXT to the SPLC.) Llll5032 (talk) 15:23, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not significant enough.

This is a small publisher of minimal noteriety. It does not warrant its own wikipedia page. Move to Delete this page. 2A02:C7C:660F:5700:2148:92B0:9903:52D6 (talk) 22:43, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree because it appears to have WP:SIGCOV. Llll5032 (talk) 22:52, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Leon Degrelle

Now calling Leon Degrelle a 'War Criminal' because he was a volunteer against Bolshevism is an indication for the low quality of this article. 105.4.5.175 (talk) 07:10, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that the article's quality leaves a lot to be desired, and it is true that Degrelle was convicted of treason rather than a war crime as such. Yet, his Nazi, SS, and post-war activities reveal something a bit more odious than anti-Bolshevism. Bobby Lawndale (talk) 17:33, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I switched the descriptor for Degrelle to "Belgian Nazi collaborator", from the same source. Thanks. Llll5032 (talk) 17:59, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(Perhaps we should stop having any (political, (anti-) or revolutionary) heroes.--Ralfdetlef (talk) 11:22, 2 May 2024 (UTC))[reply]

Fair enough. But best I can tell his infatuation with fascism and collaboration with Nazism seems to be grounded in some type of admixture of passionate anti-communism, heretical Catholicism, and disordered patriotism. Notwithstanding research, I can find no evidence of anti-Semitism for instance, though his willingness to align himself with such obviously virulent anti-Semites is certainly both revealing and disturbing. The bottom line is that many Russian and German soldiers, and their allies, behaved valiantly and were not war criminals. In sum, he appears to have been an honorable and courageous man with disturbingly serious moral and analytical blind spots. His conviction for treason seems well-earned, but he does not deserve the label "war criminal." Bobby Lawndale (talk) 11:44, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Subjective article

Why is "Black" capitalised in the article, but "White" not? I thought Wikipedia was neutral? Gaeliclad (talk) 00:36, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

One is capitalized because it is in a quotation from another source. If not in a quotation, it would be lowercased for consistency, per WP:RACECAPS, with the other terms which are lowercase in their articles. Llll5032 (talk) 01:11, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Gentile, Lewis

Just took a look at the A. H. website, there may be some interesting books: Giovanni Gentile on Marx perhaps, as G. was a hegelian philosopher; Wyndham Lewis on Hitler: would be interesting to know, if there were different editions of this one.--Ralfdetlef (talk) 11:28, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]